.455 Mark II Hand Ejector 2nd Model

lamarw

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
1,457
Reaction score
3,311
Location
Lake Martin, Alabama
This is the lot mate to the triple lock I posted a thread on earlier today. It is SN: 30825 and in a little finer condition, finish wise, than the triple lock.

Unlike the triple lock, it is absent of the numerous proof marks. There is one mark on the butt, please see picture, the auction house suggested might be a Canadian proof. I have no idea and would appreciate thoughts from others with more insight.
 

Attachments

  • 100_4991.jpg
    100_4991.jpg
    115.4 KB · Views: 99
  • 100_4994.jpg
    100_4994.jpg
    126.2 KB · Views: 112
  • Model2stStamp.jpg
    Model2stStamp.jpg
    147.7 KB · Views: 101
Register to hide this ad
That one is certainly in beautiful condition. Did you determine when it was shipped, and possibly, where?

Looking at Jim's data, I am thinking very late 1915(?)
 
Thank you AlanD.

No, I have not Jack. Your guestimate sounds reasonable. After reviewing the "Condition Evaluation" section of the SCSW" 4th Edition especially pg. 29, I also agree an "Excellent Condition" rating would be fair for this revolver. The negative is it lacks serial number matching stocks; although I have located correct vintage walnut gold medallion stocks for it.
 
Nice one!

Here's my 2nd Mod. .455:

side_l.jpg


I posted it many years ago at this thread: S&W .455 Mk. II Hand Ejector 2nd Model #69234


Now just find the time and ammo to shoot them!

Curl
 
Thank you AlanD.

No, I have not Jack. Your guestimate sounds reasonable. After reviewing the "Condition Evaluation" section of the SCSW" 4th Edition especially pg. 29, I also agree an "Excellent Condition" rating would be fair for this revolver. The negative is it lacks serial number matching stocks; although I have located correct vintage walnut gold medallion stocks for it.

And if you join the S&W Collector's Association, you could request a month and year shipping date for this revolver and for the other S&Ws that you own. And that's just one of the benefits of SWCA membership.
 
The single mark on the butt of the gun indicates that it was purchased by the Canadian government for resale to Officers. In WW 1 the officers had to buy their own kit. But the govt. kept supplies of stuff to sell them. I have one in very similar condition. I strongly suspect that they were purchase by desk jockies that never made it across the pond. A tiny bit of holster wear on the muzzle and that's it. I have a Type 1 triple lock .455 that looks like it was carried in a wet holster for the whole war. Great bore, chambers, and mechanics though. Shoots really nice.
 
Back
Top