460 Rowland, anyone use it or try it?

Tom_R

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2013
Messages
2,023
Reaction score
2,432
Location
Connecticut
I recently watched an interesting video on YouTube about running 460 Rowland through a .45acp 1911.

It Offers very similar performance to .44 Magnum ballistics, and the barrel is compensated so recoil is manageable.

Just wondering if anyone on here has tried it, and had any luck with it.
 
Register to hide this ad
44 Magnum velocity/energy from a 1911 is tough on the firearm no matter what you do. The 45 SUPER provides a significant performance increase

I have never felt the need for the expense of converting to a Rowland when so many 45ACPs can handle 45 SUPER with very minor and inexpensive changes. If I need 44 Magnum performance, I chose a firearm that is built from the ground up to withstand that kind of pressure.

I have been shooting 45 SUPER for years.

This Springfield is one of the few factory offering in 45 SUPER

Springfield%20V-16%20LS%20s.jpg


With a 45 SUPER, we are not reaching the 36,000 PSI of the 44 Magnum or the 460 Rowland's 40,000 PSI. 45 ACP runs at a max of 21,000 PSI, 45 ACP +P tops out at 23,000 PSI and 45 Super only reaches 28,000 PSI.

Using the 45 caliber 230 grain JHP as a reference velocities from a 5" barrel are as follows:
45ACP: 880FPS
45ACP+P: 980FPS
45SMC/45 SUPER: 1160FPS
460 Rowland: 1340FPS

Energy is as follows:
45ACP: 395 ft-lbs
45ACP+P: 490 ft-lbs
45SMC/45 SUPER: 650 ft-lbs
460 Rowland: 930 ft-lbs

The 45 SUPER has more than 50% extra energy over the standard 45 ACP and is very controllable without the need for a comped barrel assembly and without the need to almost double the operating pressures.

45 SUPER can even be used in some firearms with zero modification. The S&W 625 revolvers as well as any of the full size HK USPs

625%20v-comp%20small.jpg


usp-tac.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top