I have both but in the 4" (617) and 5.5" (41) varieties (I hate long barrels on handguns) but anyway, I say it comes down to how you plan to use it?
If you are looking for a super accurate gun for competition or the like, the 41 has much better trigger and overall accuracy potential. On the other hand if you have one or more center-fire revolvers and like the idea of cheap .22 practice for a DA action well then there is only one choice.
If you are just looking for a fun .22 then there are probably less expensive options that are just as much fun for plinking and what not but if you definitely want one of these 2 for that purpose, just get which ever one floats your boat more. Both are great guns in their own right but are completely different and hard to fairly compare to each other.
Originally posted by Golddog:
The 41 ... It's also VERY finicky about ammo; you'll spend forever finding something that works every time, and it's not likely to be the inexpensive bulk pack stuff.
I couldn't disagree with that more but I guess it comes down to the luck of the draw? My recent manufacture 41 has been 100% reliable with everything I've feed it including cheap bulk pack stuff.
Originally posted by Golddog:
The 617 will shoot everything well; you can feed it el cheapo rounds until the end of time.
Not nessasarly. There was a thread not too long ago about people who've had issues with 617's either not being accurate at all of having issues ejecting empty case. Again, luck of the draw. The nice thing is with either, if you have issues, S&W will take care of it.
One bonus to the 617 is that you can shoot other .22's through it like .22 shorts and longs