scooter123
Member
Texas, I don't see any need to be concerned bout the recoil of the 45LC as long as you stay with a load that conforms to it's original specification. That loading will have ballistics that are basically a duplicate of the 45 ACP. BTW, it's my impression that the 45 ACP as issued by the US military was an intentional duplicate of the ballistics of the 45LC because the Army had good experience with that older loading. With the mass of a 625 that means it will shoot only a bit stiffer that 38 spl. in the lighter K frames.
Where you'll have to exercise some caution is with some of the non standard loadings. Buffalo Bore lists a +P 45 LC "Heavy" that pushes a 325 grain bullet to 1325 FPS from a 7.5 inch barrel. Frankly, I don't know how that is even remotely possible from a +P variant of a cartridge that is specified to operate at 14,000 CUP. I suspect that particular load is probably running over 28,000 PSI, which means it's a big bore Magnum and doesn't conform to a true +P specification. In an N frame cylinder bored out to size for a 45 caliber I'm not confident it's a safe load to use. I'll also note that Buffalo Bore specifically states this load is only safe in LARGE frame Rugers and similar revolvers, it's not safe to use in smaller frames.
Where you'll have to exercise some caution is with some of the non standard loadings. Buffalo Bore lists a +P 45 LC "Heavy" that pushes a 325 grain bullet to 1325 FPS from a 7.5 inch barrel. Frankly, I don't know how that is even remotely possible from a +P variant of a cartridge that is specified to operate at 14,000 CUP. I suspect that particular load is probably running over 28,000 PSI, which means it's a big bore Magnum and doesn't conform to a true +P specification. In an N frame cylinder bored out to size for a 45 caliber I'm not confident it's a safe load to use. I'll also note that Buffalo Bore specifically states this load is only safe in LARGE frame Rugers and similar revolvers, it's not safe to use in smaller frames.