CTM
Member
I've been doing a lot of research, and I am pretty sure my next gun purchase will be a 629 with either a 4" or 6" bbl. I'm very new to revolvers and have limited knowledge, so I am hoping to learn a little from the expert opinions here.
I am very much opposed to an IL, the only revolver I own is a 442 no-lock.
So, this brings me to my question...will I be OK with an older, -4 (which I believe has the endurance package), or would I be better off with a newer model and ...remove the lock?
I probably won't shoot the gun a whole lot and will mostly use 44 spec. loads at the range, with a few mags just to keep in tune with the feel. I am not a collector and not likely to be in the future so resale is not an issue either. The gun will be in my carry rotation but will not see as much use as my SIG's, at least to begin with.
I just want a good solid shooter that will take the abuse of 44 mag loads when I feel like blasting away.
I know it is a very subjective question, but I'm still interested in some opinions.
Thanks!
Chet
I am very much opposed to an IL, the only revolver I own is a 442 no-lock.
So, this brings me to my question...will I be OK with an older, -4 (which I believe has the endurance package), or would I be better off with a newer model and ...remove the lock?
I probably won't shoot the gun a whole lot and will mostly use 44 spec. loads at the range, with a few mags just to keep in tune with the feel. I am not a collector and not likely to be in the future so resale is not an issue either. The gun will be in my carry rotation but will not see as much use as my SIG's, at least to begin with.
I just want a good solid shooter that will take the abuse of 44 mag loads when I feel like blasting away.
I know it is a very subjective question, but I'm still interested in some opinions.
Thanks!
Chet
Last edited by a moderator: