686 3" or 4"

If I could keep only one of my 686's, it would be the 3-inch'er. I like the 4", I like it a lot,
but all things considered, shooting, carrying etc. the 686+ (7 shot) would get the nod.
Not and easy choice really.

400681919.jpg


I did have one the older SSR's from 2008 (forged hammer & trigger), but sold it off last fall.
 
The more I read about the lock mechanism on the new Smiths the more concerned I get. I read the sticky on it and realize that a lot of purists don't like it. I don't particularly care for it either as far as looks go. However, my chief concern is if it's caused many "lock ups" of failures of any type. I don't need a pistol that won't shoot when I squeeze the trigger. What's the overall consensus on this? How far back in models do I have to go to get a 686 without it? Do I need to be looking for a used pistol at an upcoming gun show? Need some expert advice from you knowledgeable folks.
 
I was ready to get a 4 inch. There was a 4 inch and 3 inch at a gun show and I compared both of them. I ended up with the 3 inch as it felt balanced and just looked cool. It shoots awesome and is accurate. Personal preference.

P1090659.jpg

Beautiful piece!
 
3" vs 4"

I had a 3" with the Talo grips that I sold to get the 4" version. Now I regret it. They're both outstanding guns, but the 3" just felt better in my hand, and I was just as accurate with it as the 4". I'm going to sell the 4" and go back. Wish I could afford to keep them both...
 
How is this for a recipe....



Half of my carry options is the S&W 686+ 2.5 inch 7 shooter. It is comfortable, fast, spot on target and deadly accurate. If I had to employ any firearm it would be at 30 feet, is the farthest I would engage it, depending of course. My 2.5" will get it done faithfully. I like the 3" too, but for $850 to add 1/2 inch barrel, it can wait.

 
Last edited:
I wonder what gun he ended up with back in 2012?

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top