Is there much play in the spring tension on these? It's a 686 Plus, with a very heavy trigger. I know my 66 can't be adjusted more than about a half turn before getting light strikes, but I have it light enough to be quite enjoyable. The 686's trigger, on the other hand, is a beast. I don't want to waste my time adjusting the screw if it's just going to hit too lightly.
They're called the mainspring and the strainscrew.
The strainscrew is not an adjustment device. Seat it fully and leave it.
Back when S&W took more time with its product before shipping, gunsmiths would seat the strainscrew and stack weights on the hammer. There are specs for the amount of weight the hammer should hold, and where it should fail to hold. The strainscrew was carefully filed to reduce the mainspring resistance, and retested with the weight -- one pass at a time, then test, another pass, test, and so on until in the proper spec established to both pop primers while not being ridiculously heavy.
I don't recommend this tuning technique be attempted by an amateur.
I have a handful of spare new S&W mainsprings. Compared to the older ones, they're slightly straighter and wider and produce a noticeably heavier pull in the same revolver.
Point being, between heavier mainspring and full length strainscrews apparently simply seated and shipped, modern S&W DA pulls are heavier.
Yes, lowering the poundage on the rebound slide spring can make limited difference, but only that -- limited. You can also throw in a Wolff mainspring or reduced power mainspring (that's what S&W calls a "Performance Center tune"

) and that can improve the pull, too.
Best option is to work with it as is and get used to it, or have the gun tuned by someone who knows what they're doing.