I don’t want to go off the rails but, I’m NOT a fan of the 147g 9x19mm. My agency used the Speer GDHP 147 in the mid 90’s when I became a copper. Its had less than stellar results especially from the shorter guns; G19’s & G26’s in actual OIS’s against 2 & 4 legged baddies. Before the Speer, it was Fed’s HydraShok also 147. Those were dismal! But you know, in the 90’s it was a love affair with the cursed 147....As you all recall, it was that very bullet weight that gave the 9mm its well deserved reputation as a weak cartridge. Because physics doesn’t lie!!!
Thankfully, about 2003 the range boys decided the 124 GDHP was a better choice. Indeed it was as one of our officers found himself in a one sided shootout with a wanted felon who jumped out & started shooting before the officer could even draw on a traffic stop. Thankfully, he tripped while retreating & the perp missed him buying him time to scramble to cover. His backup arrived at the same time and engaged the suspect with her G19. One round of the 124g thru his thorax ended that fight. Entered on the R side & stopped just behind his left ribs. Full expansion, massive damage per the OME (coroner). One of the range officers was at the autopsy. He said: “worked as advertised!”
We have since upgraded to the Speer 124g +P. As a now member of the full time range staff I have been on several OIS scenes where the +P did just fine. In fact, it worked VERY well.
With the aforementioned, I can not for the life of me figure out why these ammo companies & agencies are once again selling and or buying those rounds. I don’t care how much JHP’s have improved. The 147 is slow, too slow to compensate for the lack of mass compared to its other auto ctg. brethren; .45 & .40. If a slower heavier .35 bullet etc is sooooo good, then why aren’t the .357 Mag & .357 Sig heavier & slower? Simple, they haul butt & dump a ridiculous amount of energy on the target! So, why again is slower & hevier better in a .35 caliber bullet? The smaller bullets need speed simple as that. Same reason the subsonic 5.56 loads are piss poor against human targets except when used with a suppressor. Last a checked, 5.56 rounds tear up tissue when they’re at speed.
I’m curious to see if history repeats itself for all these agencies that are on the 9mm bandwagon. The jury is still out on the new batch of 9’s performance in the real world. The .40 has 25+years of street cred to back up its data. The.45 has quite a bit more.
I will wager this. The lighter bullets in 9mm will do fine as I have plenty of experience with those. I personally don’t think the fancy heavy 9’s will do as well just as before. It’s basically a high cap .38 Spl ballistically speaking. History does indeed repeat itself, I just hope no officers get killed because of it.