RDub
Member

Hello
Most of the 9mm reviews that I did were shot with two guns.
A SIG 365 SAS, with a 3.1 inch barrel and a Taurus G3 with a 4 inch barrel.
First I do forensic exam of the ammunition. Next I shoot a group while chronographing with each gun. 10 yards with the SIG and 15 yards with the G3. Chronograph is a Oehler 35P
Then the ammunition is shot out of each gun into a 55 gallon plastic barrel of water. The bullets are then recovered, photographed and then measured for expansion. In cases where the bullet fragments and loses its jacket, a weight is taken with all the recovered material and also a weight taken with just the lead core.
Here is the link to all the photos of the review;
9mm COR-BON 124gr JHP +P — Postimages
Data Sheet

First, the bullet is actually a 124gr JHP not a 125. Aside from that, this is some remarkable ammunition. The propellant is a small extruded and not the typical small flake or flattened ball that is so common. And a mere 5.3grs yields just under 1200 fps in the 4 inch Taurus, which is the advertised velocity. The standard deviations with both guns were under 5, which is very unusual. Plus, the accuracy in both guns was more than acceptable. The expansion in both guns was good, the bullets from both guns staying together from the water test. Quite impressed with this ammunition.