A .32 Hand Ejector Target Revolver from 1905

Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
13,065
Reaction score
7,563
Location
Orange County, CA
Today I took delivery of this very nice early I-frame .32 target revolver. The finish looks too good to be original, but I am unable to identify specific features of the gun that would be associated with a refinish; I conclude there is at least an outside chance this is in original condition, but I still remain cautious. The rollmarks are crisp and unrounded, screw holes are undished, frame corners not radiused, and pin ends are not flattened. The case hardened parts are a little drab, which may indicate aging or use inconsistent with what is seen on the rest of the gun. There is no star beside the serial number and no factory return date on the left side of the grip frame. The deep dish medallion stocks are necessarily later, as such stocks did not exist until about five years after this gun was shipped (May, 1905).

1f357431-cfbb-4c58-b5a3-86ff4e8bcea2_zpsebef63e6.jpg


The serial number is 16005. The gun letters as a target revolver with checkered black hard rubber grips. But I am told by Ed Cornett, who has access to documents that allow him to identify serial number blocks for different models, that 16005 is part of of a block of standard .32 Hand Ejectors without adjustable sights. Since the letter reflects the current configuration of the gun, apart from the different stocks, it would appear that an order came in for a target revolver at a time when one could not be provided from inventory. The configuration is best explained if a fixed-sight .32 HE had been taken from inventory, delivered to the service department, and remanufactured as a target revolver to meet an immediate demand.

More photos:

DP9U0377_zpsf2679023.jpg


DP9U0375_zps91174fa1.jpg


DP9U0387_zps88fb5619.jpg


DP9U0380_zps6f976202.jpg


DP9U0379_zps29ca6425.jpg


Note the early trigger return spring anchored in the frame in front of the mainspring. The familiar trigger rebound slide with internal coil spring did not begin appearing in S&W revolvers until 1906.

The stocks are unnumbered, but in fine shape. The included medallions reflect the design used on S&W revolvers from 1910-1919, exclusive of the late-1917-early 1919 period.

DP9U0382_zpsbf57413c.jpg


DP9U0381_zps96ce61a9.jpg


It looks as though something is written inside the left cheek piece, but I have not been able to make the marks resolve themselves into comprehensible alphabetic or numeric characters.

This gun was delivered May 23, 1905 to Mr. J. R. Munn, no address reported. There were several individuals named Munn living in and around Springfield at that time, but not one of them had a name that agrees with the recorded initials. I have not had much luck finding candidate Munns in the 1900 and 1910 census records. There were Munns in Canada, too, and possibly the gun went there.

.32 target revolvers are an interest of mine in both I and K frames. This is the second early .32 target in my collection. Also in my safe is 7467, shipped in 1904, which was finished in nickel.

IMG_2633-1.jpg


ADDED: Sometimes the brain knows what the eye doesn't immediately see. I am now sure that this gun has been refinished, and probably within the last few years. The giveaway is the recoil shield, which has absolutely NO drag mark from the center pin of the cylinder assembly. It is my impression that even when there is barely any turn ring on a cylinder, the center pin drag mark can be seen. I don't know why this didn't hit me in the first place. Still, this is one of the best re-blues I have ever seen.

There is also a minor mechanical problem with the ejector star, which can rotate out of precise registration with the cylinder when the rod is pushed back. Now I know one of the reasons S&W began using locator dowels for the ejector star just a few years after this gun was manufactured.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Just beautiful, David! I love the side profile of these guns - with their high, curved hammer, and stepped grips. You sure don't find them any nicer than that one.

Jerry
 
I am so envious! That is something I would like to add to my collection, but I have never had the opportunity to hold one, much less acquire one.

Me either. I've never even seen one for sale.
f.t.

There aren't that many out there, but they are not vanishingly rare. One or two show up on Gunbroker every year, and that probably means others show up on other internet gun auction or gun sale sites. Probably the major independent auction house have one now and again.

In three to four years of tracking, I have identified 22 Model of 1903 Target Revolvers (1903-1917, all changes) and 30 of the Regulation Police Target Revolvers (1917-1940).

For a long time my notion has been that there were fewer than a thousand .32 target revolvers made in the range of the .32 HE Model of 1903 guns; total production of these was about a quarter of a million, so way less than one percent. Similarly, I have thought there were only 800-1000 .32 Regulation Police target revolvers, which is the name under which S&W marketed the .32 HE Third Model guns with long barrels and adjustable sights. But even though I still repeat those numbers, I can hear my internal hogwash detector going off when I offer them up. My brain stem may know something that my forebrain doesn't. If it should turn out that there were 2000 of each model produced, or even somewhat more, I wouldn't be surprised. In that case, there are more to be found. Keep the faith. I can't believe that theft, irreparable breakage or guns inadvertently left at the range could account for all the ones we are not seeing.
 
Last edited:
A beautiful gun, and a superb dissertation. Mr. Wilson is one of the finest sources of information to be found on this site. Thanks for sharing your pictures and your knowledge. I hope that doesn't sound too sappy!
 
Last edited:
Another fantastic revolver and an excellent write up. David, you're on a roll!
 
David,

Two more beautiful examples of scarce/rare .32 pre war targets. Those front sights just have so much more panache than the post war target huge front blade.

I notice in observing my 5th change 32 HE with single alignment pin that when pushed out, the star turns slghtly clockwise on every stroke and is pulled back into alignment by the round tipped pin just before the star seats. The slight play in the notch causes the misalignment.

On your blue one I'm sitting here wondering if ever so slight judiscious peening of one side of the edge near the star of the square notch in the star extractor shaft would fix the slight misalignment of the star upon seating.
 
Last edited:
On the blue one I'm sitting here wondering if very slight judiscious peening of one side of the edge of the square notch in the star extractor shaft would fix the slight misalignment of the star. There must be slight play in the notch causing the misalignment.

Jim, I had the same thought and may try that some day when my eyes are focusing better. Another possibility that I want to think about is perhaps peening the ends of the star arms and shaping them to better fit the rounded recesses in the cylinder recess where the star rests. But that seems like more work, and potentially more inviting of damage in light of the brittle steel in the star and the small dimensions that would permit breakage.
 
Jim, I had the same thought and may try that some day when my eyes are focusing better. Another possibility that I want to think about is perhaps peening the ends of the star arms and shaping them to better fit the rounded recesses in the cylinder recess where the star rests. But that seems like more work, and potentially more inviting of damage in light of the brittle steel in the star and the small dimensions that would permit breakage.

I agree, and unless the star contacts the recess straight on and then shifts into misalignment as it seats, I would not suspect the star tips as the culprits.
 
Back
Top