A Crash Course in Prewar Kit Guns (Two more variants added: see post no. 29)

Joined
Dec 26, 2007
Messages
13,060
Reaction score
7,549
Location
Orange County, CA
In early 1936 Smith & Wesson introduced a new model based on the .22/32 Target Revolver. That predecessor model, at its introduction in 1911, had been called the .22/32 Bekeart and for a period of time thereafter (mostly from the mid-'teens through the 1920s) the .22/32 Heavy Frame Target.

The company called the new revolver the .22/32 Kit Gun. It differed from its parent model in that it had a shorter four-inch barrel and an expanded variety of stock sizes and front sights that were offered as production options.

The photograph shows most of those options.

attachment.php




The Kit Gun was intended to be a compact adjustable-sight .22 that an individual could carry in his fishing or hiking "kit" during a day or two in the outdoors. The company's plan to differentiate clearly between a small .22 target revolver and the larger K-frame .22 Outdoorsman meant that their basic I-frame model would carry small round butt stocks. The basic Kit Gun is barely over eight inches long from muzzle to rearmost curve of the grip frame, a perfect size to carry in a large pocket or hiking backpack. But knowing that some who would be interested in the gun had hands that would find the round butt configuration too small, the company also offered the small square butt (Regulation Police) and large square butt (two-screw extension grip) options. The top row in the photograph shows the round butt configuration. The RP configuration is in the middle row, and the larger extension stocks (along with one set of custom Sandersons that I will explain later) are seen in the bottom row.

Within each row I have sorted the guns to show the standard Patridge front sight on the left, followed by the stepped half round sight that is called the USRA pocket revolver sight. Other front sight blades were also used, such as the Sheard bead you can see at the end of the first row and the King Reflector sight (probably an aftermarket replacement, and not original to the revolver) at the end of the second. One of the Patridge sights in the last row is actually a Call Brilliant sight, with an inserted stainless steel bead that is the standard sight seen on the larger K-22 Outdoorsman models.

As far as I know, the USRA sight was never used on any S&W model other than the .22/32 Kit Gun in its prewar and postwar transitional phases. Note its presence on the fourth gun in the second row. More about that gun below.

The Kit Guns supplied with the RP grip necessarily had a rebated backstrap. The large extension stocks would fit both rebated and non-rebated frames. The larger stock options covered the butt of the gun, so on these models the serial number was stamped on the forestrap of the grip frame, behind and below the trigger guard.

Interestingly some guns that now carry RP or extension stocks are found with serial numbers on the butt rather than the forestrap. This is good (but not perfect) evidence that the guns originally shipped with round butt stocks, and that the larger stocks on the guns now were owner replacements. In the case of the RP stocks, fitting them to a round butt frame required either shaving some wood from the stocks or filing a step into the back of the frame. In the photo above, both approaches are represented. The first and last guns in the second row would have shipped with round butt stocks. The anachronistic 1920s-era RP stocks on the first were whittled to fit the unmolested grip frame. On the other gun, the frame was filed down so that the unnumbered RP stocks would fit it without modification to the wood.

The last gun in row two is also unusual for its King Reflector Sight and an enlarged "target" hammer. If you look closely, you can see that the original hammer spur was removed and that a longer spur was welded on and reshaped.

The gun in the last row with Sanderson stocks is another gun that shipped with small round butt stocks. When the gun came to me it was wearing some ill fitting RB stocks from some other gun, so I put these Sanderson J-frame target stocks on it. As postwar wood they are seriously anachronistic, but they make for a more comfortable grip than the company's extension stocks.

The fourth gun in row two is a "virtual" or "honorary" Kit Gun. It was originally shipped in 1923 as a Heavy Frame Target, but in November 1946 (date code on grip frame) it went back to the factory to get a new barrel, cylinder, and refinish. The new parts were numbered to the frame. We know that the cylinder was replaced as well as the barrel because the one on the gun now has recessed chambers in the 1930s style. The original cylinder in 1923 would have had a flat rear cylinder face. The USRA sight on this gun is typical of postwar transitional Kit Guns. Before the war, the Patridge sight appears to have been the standard sight, though of course other options were possible on special order. In the postwar transitional period, the USRA sight is seen more frequently.

The exact number of prewar Kit Guns manufactured is either not known or has never been published. From statistical analysis of the 62 serial numbers known to me, I have concluded that 1300 prewar KGs were manufactured. (I can go into the rationale for this claim if anyone is interested; in general, it relies on a presumption of random distribution in observed serial numbers and the average separation between closest pairs of serial numbers.) That number may be as much as 50 too high, but I can't see a way in which the estimate would be low. With that low level of production, one can understand why these revolvers are not commonly seen. The photo above probably shows one percent of total prewar Kit Gun production.

All known prewar Kit Guns lie between serial numbers 529451 and 534600. Guns with those exact numbers have not been observed, but those are the limiting numbers in the 25-number blocks that I believe characterized prewar Kit Gun production. The lowest number in my collection is 529488; the highest is 534566. One lower numbered Kit Gun is known, as well as one higher numbered gun. Production of the .22/32 Kit Gun (and the other I-frames as well) seems to have ceased in 1940 as the company began converting to wartime contracts. At least a few Kit Guns remained in inventory through that year and even into the next, because there is one prewar Kit Gun known to have shipped in 1941.

Kit Guns in the 529xxx and some in the 530xxx serial number ranges have unmarked sideplates and display the small logo on the left side of the frame. Higher serial numbers usually have the large logo on the sideplate, indicating production in 1937 or later. There appears to be a fuzzy zone in the middle with some large-logo Kit Guns showing serial numbers lower than other KGs with small left-side logos.

As a footnote, I would like to take notice of the existence of 527712, shipped in 1934, which letters as a .22/32 Heavy Frame Target with a special order four inch barrel. The gun, which has the first USRA pocket revolver sight known to me, was delivered to one of the Wesson family. This has to have been a prototype Kit Gun, and it is possible a few other such specimens exist (or once existed) that were also turned over for family and management evaluation before a production commitment was made. Regardless of factory terminology, I would have no problem calling such guns the first prewar Kit Guns.

That's it in a nutshell.
 

Attachments

  • Kit Gun Display (cropped).jpg
    Kit Gun Display (cropped).jpg
    77.4 KB · Views: 514
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
David,

Wow a baker's dozen! Thx for the opportunity to see 14 PW KGs all in one place at the same time.

Your 'honorary' KG that was factory re-finished in 1946 appears to have a satin finish contemporary to that year, is that correct? My HFT factory re-finished in 1953 also has a satin finish as one would expect.
 
Last edited:
David,

Your 'honorary' KG that was factory re-finished in 1946 appears to have a satin finish contemporary to that year, is that correct? My HFT factory re-finished in 1953 also has a satin finish as one would expect.

The finish on the 1946 rebuild is actually kind of in between. It's not as flat as the standard postwar satin finish, but it is also nowhere near as bright and glassy as, for example, the first gun in the top row. (Sorry about the oil streaks and light burn here and there; most of these guns are high polish guns, which you would expect from the 1930s, but accidents of lighting kind of obscure that.)
 
That pic, makes me simply delirious

Wow, I'm not a collector, as such, but those are BEAUTIFUL !.
 
What an awesome collection! My knowledge of these smaller gems was non-existant. But now, as you stated, I have been given the crash course. The picture is just icing on the cake. Thanks David.
 
David, What percentage of kit guns guns have you found to have the rebated frame?
How many stamped numbered grips have you come across?

Great display of the different variations of these fine little guns.
 
USRA sight

You mention the "stepped half round USRA pocket revolver sight.
What does USRA stand for? Is USRA a trademark front sight?
 
David, What percentage of kit guns guns have you found to have the rebated frame?
How many stamped numbered grips have you come across?

Great display of the different variations of these fine little guns.

From memory, about one-third of the frames I have seen in person or in photos were rebated, but that could be the luck of the draw. Possibly rebated frames were a little more numerous than that, but they won't be more than half. I think unrebated frames were the dominant form.

Among round-butt guns, whether the stocks on the gun are original or not, my recollection is that almost all are stamp-numbered. The RP stocks are either all or almost all stamp-numbered. Some extension stocks are stamp-numbered, but others were not numbered at all.

An interesting question that it did not occur to me to look at until now is what percentage of these guns are numbered on the butt and what percentage on the forestrap? That's an indicator of whether the factory expected to be shipping a small-grip or larger-grip version of the gun. (But it's not a perfect indicator, because the factory was capable of making a gun up one way, and then sending it to the service department before shipping to be slightly modified in response to an immediate demand.)
 
Dadgummit David, there goes another keyboard! :eek: You've got to start warning me when you're going to post something like this so I have time to put on a bib! The problem is, it seems like every time you get out your camera, you post "something like this." I think you have outdone even yourself this time, though.

I think I've seen info about the old USRA as being sort of a NRA type of organization for revolver bullseye shooters in the pre-WW I period and then holding on as a sort of "niche" group thereafter, sort of like USPSA and IPSC that came along later for combat type pistol shooting. I know H&R made a series of USRA labeled revolvers (and I believe single shots) for their kinds of competition.

Back to your picture and some of the variants, I'm especially blown away by the Sanderson grips on that one on the bottom row. I hate that you "had" to use them just to replace an ill-fit set of original styles... yeah, right! They would be a great addition to any of my I-frames in a New York nanosecond!! How in the world did you find those beauties?

Gotta quit now, I'm getting electrical burns from my drool-soaked keyboard. Expect an e-mail from me once I get my laptop dried out!

Your buddy,
Charlie the Frog
 
David,

Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge. That's a fine collection, and we all stand in awe.

You have discussed with me the discrepancies in serial number range between those reported in Supica & Nahas 3rd edition and those now currently accepted. But in reading your initial post I am startled by what you identify to be the USRA front sight. Mind you, my education on this point is Supica & Nahas 3rd.

In their Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson, the authors identify the patridge front sight as the USRA sight:

S&W_22_Kit_Guns_Supica&Nahas3d_p118.jpg


On the other hand, you identify the USRA sight as, "the stepped half round sight that is called the USRA pocket revolver sight" and point to the fourth revolver in the second row of your photograph.

Would you please clarify this point? I feel sure others may benefit from your explanation, and I know I will.

Thanks so much!
 
Curl, that's a known error in SCSW3. The illustration is simply mislabeled. The inset image is the standard Patridge sight, and the USRA sight is the one seen both on the nickel gun at top and on the transitional gun at the bottom.

Here's a close-up image of the USRA sight so that everyone can see better exactly what we are talking about.

IMG_0769.jpg


This is the sight on the third gun in the top row.
 
Thanks again David!

Absent the entry in Supica & Nahas I would have identified this sight:

S&W_22_Kit_Guns_Supica&Nahas3d_p118_inset.jpg


as a patridge sight, so that has been something of a quandry in my mind. You have set me straight. I needed that!
 
Thanks for the lesson.
I am awe-struck at what I learn here on a regular basis.
Now I just need the money and opprotunity and - well, I guess I may stick to 34's & 63's, but a guy can daydream!
Regards
Russ
 
David,

An outstanding collection and a superb dissertation! My learning curve just took a nearly vertical leap. I will add your presentation to my "gun show info" file (with appropriate attribution, of course).

Bob
 
Back
Top