I thought the 5.56 was designed by "NATO" (Military) so it was all 5.56 was loaded the same specs.
Well, while there ARE differences between true NATO ammo, and standard xm855 or xm193, the 5.56 IS loaded to the same specs.
( I will use Lake City made Federal ammo as an example for this, and leave out the dozen or so other ammo that is out there that may wind up as NATO in another country)- The primary differences between say xm855 and NATO xm855 are the tests done. WHile all ammo is tested to some degree, the ammo labeled as NATO will be batch tested, and random lot tested, and the tests are pretty stringent. The criteria of the test would be not limited to.... but would include: Velocity. Waterproof testing. Accuracy testing. Bullet weight, and construction tests- visual, cutaway and destructive. Cycling tests would be done.
The xm855 you buy is the same stuff, minus the tests. Sometimes, you will actually wind up with ammo that will have a 'REJECT' on the box, and sometimes it will say something to the effect of 'Not for deployment/ Not for combat issue/ Range ammo only/ training ammo only'.
Understand that NONE of these mark ups means the ammo is anything less. If the .mil takes in a busload of xm855 for training (And they do) the extra tests of the ammo to qualify as true NATO ammo add some cost to the ammo. So, they save money by using the regular stuff in droves.
More importantly than worrying about whether your ammo is equal to true NATO ammo, worry that your rifle will sufficiently cycle the top 10 types of ammo you might wind up with in your ammo can itself.
It does no good whatsoever to have a rifle that will not function flawlessly with the 'cheaper' ammo......... when all you can get is the cheap stuff. Or, the cost of the 'good stuff' is simply too much to bear.