I've carried and used knives for years, though never as heavy as some woodsmen. Still, I've read numerous articles and I've formed my own opinions (many whom I've shared at forums such as this). But this is one I've mulled for some time, and it's based on observation and experience. Are S&W Knives on the whole underrated? Or are they overrated? My opinion is simple and perhaps predictable: YES to both!
First to dispel the beat: are they underrated? It depends on the knife and the time that's being discussed. Several years ago, S&W blade steel was pretty much 440C, it had an “iffy“ reputation. Many serious users shied away from it. And it was understandable. The construction was poor and the steel quality was an unknown. These clearly didn't didn't represent what a company, the likes of which Smith & Wesson was supposed to represent, was supposed to be made of. The term was, for the price (generally $7-$9) it was a bargain. And though the construction wasn't the greatest, it wouldn't catastrophically fail and take your fingers with it. And the 440C blade wasn't bad. Not bad at all.
Then there was the HOMELAND SECURITY fixed blade knives. It was an astoundingly good knife at a very reasonably-priced knife. Again, it was a 440C slab of heavy steel, but this time of excellent construction. It had very good chopping and cutting capability and it's edge holding was excellent for a camping knife. The only thing required, really, were work gloves because the ergonomics were horrible. But at the prices I paid for the ones I got and still have not opened or used, it was a deal! In fact, the sheath alone would cost me more to make than what I paid for the knife, which was $19.95 (shipped). Today, the blade is made from some cheap Chinese steel. May still be a great deal, but I did some searching on eBay to find the 440C models. In fact, many eBay sellers advertised their blades as being 440C, and I cancelled the transaction when the sellers couldn't confirm they had the 440C models.
Do what do you think? Good or bad experiences with S&W?
First to dispel the beat: are they underrated? It depends on the knife and the time that's being discussed. Several years ago, S&W blade steel was pretty much 440C, it had an “iffy“ reputation. Many serious users shied away from it. And it was understandable. The construction was poor and the steel quality was an unknown. These clearly didn't didn't represent what a company, the likes of which Smith & Wesson was supposed to represent, was supposed to be made of. The term was, for the price (generally $7-$9) it was a bargain. And though the construction wasn't the greatest, it wouldn't catastrophically fail and take your fingers with it. And the 440C blade wasn't bad. Not bad at all.
Then there was the HOMELAND SECURITY fixed blade knives. It was an astoundingly good knife at a very reasonably-priced knife. Again, it was a 440C slab of heavy steel, but this time of excellent construction. It had very good chopping and cutting capability and it's edge holding was excellent for a camping knife. The only thing required, really, were work gloves because the ergonomics were horrible. But at the prices I paid for the ones I got and still have not opened or used, it was a deal! In fact, the sheath alone would cost me more to make than what I paid for the knife, which was $19.95 (shipped). Today, the blade is made from some cheap Chinese steel. May still be a great deal, but I did some searching on eBay to find the 440C models. In fact, many eBay sellers advertised their blades as being 440C, and I cancelled the transaction when the sellers couldn't confirm they had the 440C models.
Do what do you think? Good or bad experiences with S&W?