Attacked by Pitbull.. What would you do?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sorry this happened to you bigggbbruce. I had a similar situation about two years ago. My shepherd was attacked by a pit-bull. Like you I separated the two with my foot. It was a stupid thing for me to do. If the dog had instinctively clamped down on my foot, I would have been in deep trouble.

I'm glad your situation worked out for the moment.

You asked what I would do? Next time it will be, press, reset, press, reset, assess. There just isn't time to decide of the snarling dog is a real threat or can be driven off. If we're wrong, it could cost a limb or life.



I don't believe the dog felt threatened by the gun with the safety enabled they know the difference between the safety on and off.
I copied this statement and highlighted it so others could see just how ridiculous it is.
 
I live in Oregon, too. After reading your story I googled and read some of Oregon laws pertaining to shooting a dog. It looks like it is not in your interest to shoot a non-threatening dog. You may want to review the laws in our state.

I think that you originally did the right thing and made the right decision.

I like this post, it sums things up well.

However, I wouldn't have kicked it. Colt Detective Special, 125 gr. JHP +P, as many shots as needed!
 
You asked what I would do? Next time it will be, press, reset, press, reset, assess. There just isn't time to decide of the snarling dog is a real threat or can be driven off. If we're wrong, it could cost a limb or life.

Yep..

Second attack.. this will be my primary thought.
 
A pit mix ran at me once. Don't know if he wanted to play or attack. Somehow when I stood my ground and drew down on him, he knew to turn tail and go the other way. Maybe he'd been shot at before. Who knows.
 
If I see the dog again on my property I will drop it on the spot.

How would you react?

If I see the dog the FIRST TIME, and he goes into attack mode...there won't be a second time. I carry a firearm to protect myself, loved ones (and perhaps others) from the immanent threat of great bodily harm or death.

Why would I risk either when I have the means on my person to prevent it?

An expandable baton works great against a dog. I would be worried about shooting my dog if there was a fight breaking out.
A few strikes to the ribs will deter most dogs. A hard blow to the skull would be fatal.

Why would you wait until the dogs are embroiled in a fight in which YOUR dog may be killed, or count on "trying" to break it up with a baton when you have the means to definitely protect your dog AND yourself from injury before the fighting starts? :confused:


When I spoke with the woman. I told her I gave her dog the benefit of doubt.

I was making friends with her dog while we spoke. I do like dogs.

I like PEOPLE too! But if someone attacks me or mine with the intent and ability to do serious harm, well, you fill in the blank.
 
Last edited:
The same thing came up in another thread a week or so ago. Shooting a dog in a public place is going to waste a lot of your time and money. It's usually the damned owners fault they have no idea how to train a dog. Unfortunately with the legal system you probably wouldn't be justified in shooting the dog until it was biting you. Pepper spray is probably the only answer.
 
I live out in the country on seven acres. There are only two of us in a full section (square mile) they own the rest of it. I have three dogs, a male border collie, a female chocolate lab and a female pit bull/lab mix. The pit is very defensive and can be aggressive if she doesn't know you. However, if a stray comes onto our property and is threatening, I have no qualms about putting it down.

Pits are very loyal protective dogs. Typically, if you do not threaten them, they will not threaten you.
 
Dogs know the difference between the safety on and off? Really? Amazing, the things I've learned hanging out on an Internet forum.

Wait a second, though...what if you have one of those pistols with no external safety? Or a hammerless revolver? Would the dog attack cause he doesn't see or hear you take the gun off safe? Would he just assume you have the safety on?

I can see right now I'm gonna have to talk to my dogs about this.
chairfall.gif

Oh yeah - dogs know!
In fact, they can tell if you have a Smith, a Ruger or a Glock!
What they can't tell yet is if you have a round in the chamber....but they're working on it!!! :D:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Dogs definitely know what sticks are the small ones are for throwing and the big ones are for getting thrashed with. Still think they're working on the gun thing because they only usually find out once what a gun does. I stand to be corrected.
 
To the OP: You showed great restraint because I would have dropped him with a HST. That kind of dog will hurt somebody eventually!

NC
 
So you were carrying three guns the first time...the .22 mag mini (whatever that is), a J-Frame (of unknown caliber), and the Ruger Mark II? And you often carry an axe handle with you as well? And you're going to add a .45 to the mix.

Okay. It's all clear to me now.
confused2.gif

Skip the axe handle.. and yes on the rest.
confused2.gif


I shoot in an abandoned house on my property. The Ruger was in my hand the first time 'cause I was on my way to pop off a few. The others are primary and bug.

Right now the woman is a trespasser. She is not a recognized renter and was told to leave by the owner.

She knows I will not hesitate if a second attack occurs. I was lucky the first time. I'm not a very good gambler.
 
Last edited:
I LOVE pits. Having said that any dog that attacks me or mine I would have shot . UNfortunately the dog, any dog, is a product of its owner. Pitts are no more dangerous than other large protective breeds. They have an unearned rep for being the fearsest largely from urban myths. This causes them to be over bread for protection and fighting. Poor animal doesn't stand a chance.

Just in case anyone is wondering there is no such thing as a locked jaw in dogs and the hardest bit is from a rottweiler not a Pitt bull
 
You say you don't own the land, but an uncle does? As with the adjacent land.

So, really it's not YOUR property. The dog isn't trespassing on YOUR property. Just remember that if you decide to "drop it on the spot" if it's not a threat to you or your dog.

Might save yourself a headache.

If the dog is a threat to you or your dog, that's a whole other story.

But you might also want to consider that this woman is obviously aware of the situation. If you shoot her dog for attacking yours when you let it out, she may bring up the fact that both of you are living on your uncles land, and you knew about the issue but decided to let your dog roam free anyway.

I'm just giving some of my thoughts. Be careful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top