Absalom
SWCA Member, Absent Comrade
A little history reminder, about one of the most under-appreciated battles of the Plains Wars, even though it was numerically the largest.
Everybody knows about Custer and the Little Bighorn. But nine days earlier, on June 17, 1876, on the banks of Rosebud Creek, the same warriors that fought Custer confronted General George Crook's column about 50 miles to the South.
You can find the details on Wikipedia and in many good books.
A day of heavy but dispersed fighting left Crook's troops (about 950, plus a couple hundred Indian scouts and armed civilians) in control of the field with only about 20-30 dead, and the Sioux and Cheyenne withdrew.
But it was a strategic victory for the tribes, as Crook decided not to advance and instead to turn back and resupply. The decision haunted his career ever since.
Had he continued as planned, the Battle of the Little Bighorn would have either not happened or at least turned out differently, as it would have fundamentally affected the movement of the tribal villages over the next week.
At the very least, a communications and intelligence failure may have doomed Custer. All indications are that the information about the battle did not reach Custer's command before his attack. Custer could be rash, but he wasn't stupid. Had he been aware that he wasn't just capturing some villages, but that the tribes he was tracking were in an aggressive mode and large and confident enough to seek out and attack a force more than times-and-a-half the size of his, and fight it to a standstill, his dispositions would almost certainly have been different.
Everybody knows about Custer and the Little Bighorn. But nine days earlier, on June 17, 1876, on the banks of Rosebud Creek, the same warriors that fought Custer confronted General George Crook's column about 50 miles to the South.
You can find the details on Wikipedia and in many good books.
A day of heavy but dispersed fighting left Crook's troops (about 950, plus a couple hundred Indian scouts and armed civilians) in control of the field with only about 20-30 dead, and the Sioux and Cheyenne withdrew.
But it was a strategic victory for the tribes, as Crook decided not to advance and instead to turn back and resupply. The decision haunted his career ever since.
Had he continued as planned, the Battle of the Little Bighorn would have either not happened or at least turned out differently, as it would have fundamentally affected the movement of the tribal villages over the next week.
At the very least, a communications and intelligence failure may have doomed Custer. All indications are that the information about the battle did not reach Custer's command before his attack. Custer could be rash, but he wasn't stupid. Had he been aware that he wasn't just capturing some villages, but that the tribes he was tracking were in an aggressive mode and large and confident enough to seek out and attack a force more than times-and-a-half the size of his, and fight it to a standstill, his dispositions would almost certainly have been different.