Beretta "92 FS"

:eek:

Never heard of Glock? Or H&K? :cool:

But neither of those would have, nor agree to building, a US mfg plant to make the gun(s). Beretta did & that's why they got the contract.

As an Sig owner, I contend the 92FS is ten times the gun the 320 is. :)
As a side note, completely unrelated, Beretta first built their plant in Maryland. The gun hating state government drove them out and Beretta rebuilt in Tennessee.
 
I much prefer the frame mounted PT92 also.
Liked it so much that I snagged a PT92 Compact, new old stock (real old 1994) at $400 OTD.
Sold the full size for the same amount as the Compact.

Earlier this year I found another new old stock Taurus, a M85 with 3" bbl. Doesn't appear to have been shot.

I know I know they aren't a Beretta or an S&W. They are nice weapons that didn't break the bank. They will do for their intended purposes.

So you all can flame away, I can take it.
Nothing wrong with a Taurus. A friend was shooting one in .357, along with a S&W and Ruger .357, this morning.
 
I really wanted to like the 92, but the square-edged OEM style grips, the very curved trigger, and the DA trigger reach in another zip code all conspired to spoil my first try. Many times since I have come close to grabbing a PT92 cheap to fiddle with but lack of funds or somebody else with deeper pockets at auction have always intervened. I would like to try a 92 again with more hand friendly grips and a straighter trigger.
 
Mine ain't as pretty:

iscs-yoda-albums-pistols-all-brands-picture22400-beretta-92-s-italian.jpg


Do you actually shoot those pretty ones? :D
Starsky called. He wants his gun back.
 
Back
Top