Carrot
Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2013
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 13
I second the Nikon recommendation. In my humble opinion, they make the best scope under $250, and they make some nice AR specific models. If you're looking to shoot coyotes at 200+ yards, you're really going to want an optic that gets you at least 9x, maybe even 12x. I personally wouldn't buy a cheap scope with an illuminated reticule, but that's just me - the quality difference between cheap light-up scopes and expensive ones is HUGE, and I wouldn't buy one at all if I couldn't afford a good one (which I can't). Good glass will transmit enough light for you to shoot in pretty dark conditions, and if it's too dark to shoot with a plain reticule, it's probably too dark to be shooting it at all.
The Nikon P223 3-9x40 or 4-12x40 are both great value for money and have BDC reticles, with high-transparency glass. For maximum versatility on a limited budget, I'd go with the 3-9x40 (which is almost the same scope I have on my Remington 700 - I have the ProStaff, not the P233).
I just did the comparison between the nikon and Bushnell 3-9 AR specific scopes. I went with the Bushnell. It has a slightly closer eye relief and, in my opinion, slightly brighter and clearer. I found it a few bucks cheaper for a nicer optic.
That said, for the money the nikon is nice too.
I leave that guy at 3x power and have the 45 degree sights for anything that's closer than a 3x scope can handle. But, my perps are usually raccoons, not people. The 45 degree sights are so easy to access with a simple roll of the rifle counterclockwise. It takes some practice to roll far enough to achieve the proper sight picture right away. I find that if I think about getting my elbow up and out, it snaps into place pretty quickly.
It also works best on a gas block with a rail on top rather than a front sight.
Disclaimer: I'm fairly new to ARs, but not to shooting. Your mileage may vary.