/Your hand written non notarized or witnessed receipt is worth bupkis in court. What it does do is give the BATFE goofs evidence that you may be doing business as an unlicensed gun dealer.
Man you guys can really grasp some straws with some convoluted logic . . .
How does the above statement differ in your world from the fact that if YOU are called into question about a gun they KNOW was signed out to you and you have NO other explanation or documentation, that "the BATFE goofs" (as you call them) don't have de facto evidence that you are operating as an unlicensed gun dealer. Unless you want to compound it by lying and tell them someone stole it and it just wasn't important enough for you to report it to the police.
You guys are so busy trying to justify a sloppy way of doing things that you're contorting in all directions. If you are comfortable operating that way - have at it. It's not illegal . . .yet (though that's probably coming).
And redlevel, I too have seen and been around most of those scenarios you relate seeing and being part of - the OP was asking about how others handle it. I told him. Neither you or m1gunner seem to be doing anything illegal or even attempting to - that's the way things are done in a lot of places in the country and as m1gunner said (and I did, if you bother to read the posts) that if it doesn't 'feel' right - you pass on completing the sale.
The unspoken 800 pound gorilla here that most who operate this way don't bother to mention, is that they likely have no qualms about operating this way with one they bought that way. But if their name is tied to that gun by paperwork I'm betting quite a few less actually do that when pressed to tell the truth.
As an FFL holder for several years I can attest that when an agent of the gubmint is standing in your living room looking at your records and asking questions, even of a general nature, the mood is quite different than when you're posting on a forum about "well, here's what I'd tell those goofs".
I'm not a lawyer or a police officer, but I have been around long enough to observe that anybody can sue anybody for anything. Doesn't have to have merit - but you can still find yourself in legal jeopardy (or the hassle and expense of sorting it all out) by doing nothing wrong. Long after criminal charges are dismissed in a lot of cases people are still successfully sued in civil court for not exercising prudent caution or due diligence. The standard for proof is a lot less there. Mas Ayoob once commented on those who carry and like to wear T-shirts with catchy phrases like
"Kill 'em & let God sort 'em out". He said if he ever had to shoot someone he hoped when the cops showed up he was wearing a shirt the said
"Peace on earth, good will toward men".
Operate as you wish - I was criticizing no one who operates this way. I was relating how I see it and participating in the discussion - that's the purpose of the thread. You pays yer money and you takes yer chances. Too many people in the world looking for an easy score at someone elses expense for my peace of mind, if it doesn't concern you, carry on. After carefully re-reading my original post in this thread ( which some should apparently do) I find NOTHING where I (unlike some of you) dispensed any legal advice or said
"Here's how you should do it !". The OP asked how others handled it and I told him how
I handle it. I'm done with this silliness.