D d.t.h. Member Joined May 26, 2008 Messages 8 Reaction score 0 Jan 18, 2009 #1 I just saw a new "no lock" 642-3 but it was black. Are these factory rejects they refinished?
OP D d.t.h. Member Joined May 26, 2008 Messages 8 Reaction score 0 Jan 18, 2009 #2 I just saw a new "no lock" 642-3 but it was black. Are these factory rejects they refinished?
Kid Ray Member Joined Feb 9, 2006 Messages 7 Reaction score 0 Location SC Jan 19, 2009 #3 Probably not... 642 is Stainless Steel & a 442 is identical but is carbon steel, finished black. Are you sure it was a 642? --- Ray
Probably not... 642 is Stainless Steel & a 442 is identical but is carbon steel, finished black. Are you sure it was a 642? --- Ray
OP D d.t.h. Member Joined May 26, 2008 Messages 8 Reaction score 0 Jan 19, 2009 #4 it was stamped 642
DC7 Member Joined Mar 13, 2006 Messages 299 Reaction score 129 Jan 20, 2009 #5 Smith sells a 642 PowerPort - Pro Series revolver with an all-black finish. But according to the picture found HERE on their website, it does have an internal lock. I've never seen or heard of a no-lock 642 with a factory black finish.
Smith sells a 642 PowerPort - Pro Series revolver with an all-black finish. But according to the picture found HERE on their website, it does have an internal lock. I've never seen or heard of a no-lock 642 with a factory black finish.
H hd1. Member Joined Sep 20, 2005 Messages 18 Reaction score 2 Location Michigan, USA Jan 20, 2009 #6 Originally posted by Kid Ray: 642 is Stainless Steel & a 442 is identical but is carbon steel, finished black. Ray Click to expand... To clarify, you are talking about the cylinders of the 642 and the 442. The frames on both models are aluminium.
Originally posted by Kid Ray: 642 is Stainless Steel & a 442 is identical but is carbon steel, finished black. Ray Click to expand... To clarify, you are talking about the cylinders of the 642 and the 442. The frames on both models are aluminium.
