Browning Hi Power

Liked BHP's and had a bunch of 40 S&W range pick ups (couldn't resist). Wanted a fuller chamber than a Glock (years ago) to use up all the brass. All the BHP's owned now have the preferred thin wood grips. However, the 40 does not get used much.

9mm BHP is one of my favorite range pistols, and a natural fit for the hand. An Israeli surplus was my first ($275), and with the beat up epoxy finish, never worry about marking it up.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0276.jpg
    IMG_0276.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG_0241.jpg
    IMG_0241.jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 26
Bought mine in 1967-my first handgun-and still have it. In recent years have shot it with a Ciener conversion unit. Since JMB and Dieudonne Saive designed it around the 9MMP it can't be rechambered in longer and larger
rounds, the 40 S&W is a bit of a stretch for it. I found the rate of twist and depth of lands and grooves in the BHP barrel allowed for good shooting of lead bullets.
 
81 HP worked over by C&S around 85. A few years back Jim Hoag, RIP, had to fix some hammer follow…but nice to know the last guy to touch it was Jim. Recently put on Lok G tens. Way better than the stock 2X4s.
 

Attachments

  • 954E0B51-93D2-4535-95D6-C25FE0D518BD.jpg
    954E0B51-93D2-4535-95D6-C25FE0D518BD.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 48
  • D607ACCB-872D-4619-B407-CF45F885C625.jpg
    D607ACCB-872D-4619-B407-CF45F885C625.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 51
The BHP 40 was beefed up to handle the cartridge. The slide is thicker, heavier recoil spring, and a cast frame instead of forged. Because the cast frame was harder than the forged ones, the slide was also hardened better. It also has three lugs on the barrel instead of two. It is kind of a super BHP.

Indeed. Mine has eaten thousands of rounds and I've had zero issues, not even with springs.
 
In early 70s had new HP, Colt Commander & SW 39. Results the HP was most accurate, S&W 39 much easier to shoot because of sights. The only thing the Colt had going for it was that it would shoot anything you stuffed in it.
Now only have the Comp model with adj sights and long barrel.
 

Attachments

  • B7D0C41D-AC75-4F29-B5CC-46036F83EAAC.jpg
    B7D0C41D-AC75-4F29-B5CC-46036F83EAAC.jpg
    60.9 KB · Views: 27
In early 70s had new HP, Colt Commander & SW 39. Results the HP was most accurate, S&W 39 much easier to shoot because of sights. The only thing the Colt had going for it was that it would shoot anything you stuffed in it.
Now only have the Comp model with adj sights and long barrel.


Got one of these, and it took some playing with recoil springs to function with my 115 target loads, which do 1150 fps. Lucked into it at local show because the dealer the guy was offering it to didn't know what it was. Spotted the attempted transaction and immediately "hovered".
 
.40 for sale

A previous owner removed the magazine safety and the trigger seems quite good. Trigger pull gauge puts it at about 4.5 pounds.

For those of you who have a BHP 40, a friend of mine is looking for one if you want to move it along.

I'd been planning on selling mine, but I'm in illinois, and its ten round magazine limit makes it more attractive now.
 
Last edited:
Mine still has the magazine safety, yet has a fairly good trigger pull.
Bought a used barrel, was getting horrid accuracy. I was shooting 9MM out of a 40 S&W barrel.
 
I've heard it can be done

<tongue in cheek> Of course it can! It says "9mm & .40 S&W" right on the cover of the owners manual. ;)

——

9mm getting fired in a .40 S&W barrel happens on an occasional basis, based on the very strange looking 9mm brass I find on one of the local ranges.
 
Last edited:
I never owned a HP until a few years ago Classic Arms bought a crate of used Belgian state police guns. These had "ALUMINUM" frames! I bought one immediately. Trigger was **** and finish was painted on. Wayne Novak bead blasted the slide and blued it satin, installed new lo-carry sights. I threw away the mag safety and installed a B&H Spring's SFS kit with new sear and hammer. I love this gun! Light chrisp single action trigger now and can carry cocked and locked with hammer "down" with the SFS system. I now prefer this gun to my Sig P226.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, the only BHP I regret letting go was my .40. It goes out of my mind for long periods of time . . . and then I see a thread like this one.

Sigh.

Nice seeing you today, Brother Shark Bait - THANK YOU for the fantastic Christmas present! :D
 
Have the same 1995 deep blue with adjustable sights. Heavy recoil spring and heaviest trigger of my three BHPs, but fun to shoot. Was in the display at the local gun counter for a long time, then they marked it down to the same price as the base model, and no interest for 6 months......sold! Congrats on a rare Browning.
 
My meager collection. Top a 1976 CAPTAIN "245" series in 9mm. Bought it new in '76. FEG HP in 9mm with SFS installed. Good clone of the HP with most part's interchangeable. And a 40SW PRACTICAL. Each with their saddles…..
I do like the 40 BHP, but for whatever reason, it always seems "larger" to me than the 9mm counterparts. It certainly feels a bit "beefier" than 9's . The BHP, to me, has always been a classic, elegant , sophisticated design.
 

Attachments

  • AAFB9E4E-746D-4A09-A8FA-812AB07193DF.jpg
    AAFB9E4E-746D-4A09-A8FA-812AB07193DF.jpg
    132.6 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top