A lot of Berdan is corrosive b/c the surplus corrosive ammo used Berdan, but the commercially produced stuff isn't necessarily corrosive. For example all currently made Wolf ammo, Berdan and boxer primed, even the steel stuff, is non-corrosive. Tula handgun is non-corrosive currently, I think rifle ammo varies by type. The new Bear is non-corrosive as well I believe.
The "corrosive" label is a marketing kiss of death in the US market, they're all moving away from it b/c it just won't sell.
Re Russian ammo generally, some think Tula and Bear burn dirtier so you have to clean more b/c of that. I don't find Wolf to be any dirtier than others, IMO it's the best of the foreign ammo. It's a matter of the price point versus the brass/steel trade off for the steel Wolf for me.
Personally I don't have issue with the Russian ammo. I clean my guns after shooting anyway, the difference in work is negligible, and it shoots fine. Some see it as cheap or sub-standard, I've never had or seen any issues with it at a rate higher than the US made ammo.
Maybe you don't load with it in your 9mm for carry (maybe you do, like I said I haven't seen evidence of statistically higher failure rates), but for range ammo I don't see a problem unless a particular gun has an issue with steel case.
The only disadvantage to it IMO is that you can't reload Berdan primed steel case ammo very easily. It can be done, but it's a non-standard deal. So if you reload I wouldn't buy it, otherwise I wouldn't think twice about using the Russian ammo for range shooting.