Camera Advice

Harrison

US Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
2,735
Reaction score
2,152
City & State/Province
Central Texas
I am thinking about taking up landscape and maybe some nature photography as a hobby in my old age. I don't know a lot about the different cameras, but have heard that a single lens reflex is the way to go. Does anyone on the forum have any advice or opinion on what brand and model are good buys and what lens I need?
Thanks
 
That's an extremely wide open question and just as you would come to this site to ask about Smith & Wessons, you should go to this site and read for a while: Digital Photography Review


Just to expand on that, your question is kind of like going to a photography site and saying, "Hey, I want to start shooting as a hobby. What kind of gun should I get?"

Besides all the news and equipment reviews, there are forums for various areas of interest. You might want to look into the Beginners Forum (depending on your level of knowledge) or perhaps the Landscape and Travel, or Nature and Wildlife.

What is your level of experience with photography?
What camera(s) do you currently have and use?
What is your area of interest? You mention landscape and nature.
What is your budget?
Are you willing to invest the time and effort to learn post-processing to maximize the potential of your images, or do you want to just point and shoot?
Etc.

Just like with guns, it can be overwhelming. But dig into it and you can find out a lot.
 
My personal opinion, is that they are all pretty good now. I would look at the quality of the lens and the controls.

My current camera is a Sony cybershot pocket camera. It has a Carl Zeiss lens. It doesn't have a full frame CCD array, but is larger than most.

Panasonic had a pocket camera that used a Leica lens, not sure of the model number.

My biggest issue with digital cameras is the controls are way too complicated with too many modes and options. I have a hard time taking a flash picture that turns out. It makes me want to dig out my old Pentax K1000.
 
Something I highly recommend is that you go to a camera shop and handle some. Find out which ones fit your hands well and is comfortable to hold. Once you get things narrowed down then I highly recommend renting the different possibilities to see their quality and how well you like the interface.

You can't go wrong with a DSLR from Nikon or Canon (I shoot canon and you can see many of my photos on this site or visit Home - The Camera's Eye). I also wouldn't rule out the Sony mirrorless system as I've heard a lot of good things about them and the quality I've seen from them has been excellent.
 
Regarding picture quality, the quality of the lens is more important than the camera it is used with. One other thing you should learn is the use of more advanced digital imaging software, such as Photoshop. That will be at least as important as the camera and lens used.
 
Nikon here.
Presently using a D-5500.
Have a 8, 10-24, 18-55, 18-200, 35, 80-400.
All Nikkor except the oddball 8.
Recently, Have bought and sold more lenses than I have Guns!
Have tried the Sony mirrorless, they take good pictures but I still like a viewfinder!
Had one with a viewer, didn’t like the view!
Smartphones have a pretty good camera.
Often Use my iPhone 7 camera.
Most of the gun-Knife pics I post here I shoot with my iPad.
I post from the iPad, so it convenient to shoot and post from the same device.
iPad City Knife.
 

Attachments

  • 6FA4FAAF-AFD9-4DD7-B611-FFCF5ED9F65F.jpg
    6FA4FAAF-AFD9-4DD7-B611-FFCF5ED9F65F.jpg
    49.9 KB
Last edited:
My forum name says it all. I shoot guns for a hobby and I shoot cameras for a living, hence DOUBLESHOT. I am a professional school photographer. We do it all, from team photos, enviromental portraits, sports, etc. I have used Nikon cameras since 1974. If you don't plan to shoot video then go with a DSLR. Canon also makes nice items. If video is your primary goal then go with mirrorless. Each can do both but DSLR are better for stills and mirrorless are better for video. What ever you get read the instruction manual because most will teach you basic photography. The reason for using a more expensive camera with interchangeable lens is control. A point'n'shoot gives you no control but a DSLR lets you control how you photos look. Just my advice. I hope it helps.

Also - I agree with the advice of checking out DPReview. You can find me there also as camguyed. Check out my gallery there.
 
Last edited:
Photographer

I spent 15 years as a full time photographer, and I have been widely published. (Not really as big a deal as you would think). Over the years, I have used Mamiya, Hazzelblad, Bronica, Canon, Nikon, Olympus, and probably something else. Currently, I have a Canon EOS-1D, but only because it was left over from my previous vocation. In truth, It is a tank, and I would like to have something lighter. All that said...... which was was the best? All, and none. There were things I liked and disliked about each. In the end, it's like a gun. Get the one that fits your hand and has intuitive controls for you. For me, that is Canon with the wheel on the back. For my son, it is a Nikon. See what fits in your hands. Also, I like light. If you don't take it places, it is a waste of money. Put your $$ into lenses over the body, and a great tripod. You will not be sorry.
 
You might be just as happy with one of the "super zoom" cameras from a major maker. I have a pair of Sony Alpha cameras and several lenses, but I'm just a hack when it comes to photography. A friend uses a Canon point and shoot with a big zoom ratio ( I think it's 60x). His photos usually look far better than mine do because he has the skills that I lack.

You can buy equipment, but you can't buy skill. That takes time, study, and practice.
 
If you are hoping to make a few dollars, then get a fancy digital camera. If you want to take lots of pictures, get a fancy digital camera. If you want something that is easy to use, get a fancy digital camera. If you want to enjoy the process, don't mind learning a bit, and want the most amazing photos possible, then have a look at large format photography.

Large format is the Civil War era camera technology. No auto focus or 30 different settings. No batteries at all. They use film. Negatives measure 4x5, 8x10 inches or larger. Image quality is far beyond what you can get with even the best digital cameras.

Big thing with large format is that the film and lens are independent of each other. Modern camera has the film and lens fixed to the body. Lens goes forwards and backwards. Thats it. With large format the lens and film can also be moved up, down, side to side, or angled forward, backward, side to side. This means that you can have focus from close up to far away at the same time with wide open apeture. You can also vary perspective. Tall building have straight sides instead tapering towards the top. Or you can zoom in on one side of an image but not the other. You can take a picture looking straight at a mirror and not have a reflection of the camera. Very long exposures are common. That means it is possible to take pictures in a room that has people walking around in it and not have the people show up on the picture. It does all sorts of neat things.

New large format cameras are very expensive. You can get used ones on Ebay cheap. Cameras and lenses that are 100 years old work just as good as new ones. Pretty much any lens works on any camera.

There are some drawbacks. It is slow. With a digital camera you can take pictures as fast as you push the button. With large format it is very common to spend half an hour setting up a single photo. No batteries or electronics to figure anything out for you. You have to actually know how to do photography. The cameras are pretty bulky. They use large sheets of film that you are not likely to find locally. It is still made and not going away. Large format film is still quite popular for art and landscape photography. But you will either have to send the film out for developing or develop it yourself. Then you need to get a film scanner and an expensive photo printer.

Large format is to photography as flintlocks are to hunting.
 
I used an SLR for years but the bulk and weight of carrying it and a couple of lenses meant I only took it on dedicated shoots. The small super zooms are a pocketable option. There are also excellent pocketable large sensor compacts, though they are pricey.

Sometimes getting "the" shot means having your camera at unplanned moments and pocketable sized cameras aid in that. Cell phones are only a last resort for landscape/nature shots.


Add another vote for the DP Review website. They have been my number one reference for years.
 
Digital SLR still the best, still carry and use one.
But the Smartphone Camera is repidly replacing the point and shoots.
The Smartphone is the one you have with you and that’s the camera you are most likely to use.
Like - you are on you normal morning walk.
You see this really Red Roadster.
You move on in.
OMG! It’s a Ferrari !
Of course you want to shot!
Shot with what? Your iPhone!
 

Attachments

  • B9B49719-4694-443B-9E97-FCD5A448328E.jpg
    B9B49719-4694-443B-9E97-FCD5A448328E.jpg
    89.8 KB
Last edited:
For me, the change to digital took away the fun of photography. I have $$$ invested in Nikon equipment, and no access to film or processing locally. I can order the film, and send it off for processing, but previous attempts resulted in a waste of money and time.
 
If you are just getting interested in photography, and not any previous experience in using fully adjustable cameras, don't know what an "f" stop or a shutter speed or an ASA or ISO is, then don't spend big dollars on a camera yet. Buy a digital camera with at lease a 4X (or greater) zoom lens in the $300 give or take range. This will get you into taking pictures enough to know if you really enjoy it.

A Nikon Professional (digital) and a variety of lenses will cost several thousand dollars. But, if you want to enter competitions and/or sell photo's you will need that quality. DO NOT neglect to get a good tripod, and use it, as well as a cable release.

I was a semi professional, part time doing weddings and some commercial work, but primarily a camera club competitive photographer. Contests and Salons while shooting everything in "FILM", working until late at night in a darkroom, laboring over B&W enlargements, processing my own Ektachrome, and mounting slides in custom sized mounts.

Today with digital camera and a computer you can produce quality photo's easily.

But you still need Education. Get instructional books on Composition, lighting, exposure control, freezing action, blurring motion, posing people, positioning subjects. Years ago (1970's or so) in one of the photo magazines there was a monthly column called "Seeing Pictures". This helped develop the ability to look as a scene and "see" the part that could make a picture. I don't know if this exists any longer or not, but if you can find any they are worth while.

With the advent of digital photography, I seemed to have lost any interest in "creating" pictures. I use a Cannon pocket size, 12.1 megapixel, 4X zoom, PowerShot with Image Stabilizer. I shoot my guns, and take vacation pictures.

I hope you continue your interest, it can be a great hobby, but learn how before spending huge amounts of money on equipment.
 
Last edited:
I bought my wife a Nikon D7100 a couple of years ago for shooting wildlife photos. I got 2 lenses to start with a 18x55mm and a 55x300mm
those work well enough for most shots but sometimes you need a bit more so about 6 months ago I got her a 200x500mm newly released Nikon lens and she loves it. Don't know how much you had in mind to spend, the equipment listed above would be right around 3000 bucks.
 
Nikon P900

Was searching for a camera before my trip to England last year where I would be shooting the World Cup of Women's Lacrosse and some historical stuff, landscapes, buildings, you name it.

Thought I wanted a camera with multiple lenses and asked a pro photographer what he recommended.

He said skip that; get a Nikon P900. So I did!

Camera has more capabilities than do I but does a marvelous job!

Easy to use, relatively speaking. Has near field Bluetooth interface with iPad and other such devices which allows for near instant uploads.

Love mine.

Hope you find what you need, too,

Be safe.
 
...my wife recently bought a D3400 Nikon DSLR in a package deal with two lenses and a case...

810_0262-1200.jpg


...noted camera guy Ken Rockwell said this about the D3400...

..."The D3400 is for people who want great pictures. More expensive cameras are for people who want fancier cameras."...

..."The D3400 works fantastically well. A few years ago a camera this good would have been unimaginable at any price."...

...click on the link below for his full review...

https://kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3400.htm#intro
 
Last edited:
Reminder: With regards to digital cameras and lenses, the purpose of them is to create digital files that you'll then use to do whatever you want with them. That said, the camera and lens is perhaps 1/2 the equation, the other half is your being comfortable managing digital files and learning whatever software you'll use to edit and optimize your photos. And of course you need a computer that's good for digital editing, software such as Lightroom or Photoshop; if you get halfway serious you'll want to invest in a color management device that calibrates the color of your display. The learning (and spending) never really ends once you enter the digital photography realm. Some people buy color printers for printing their photos; I'm happy using the online places to make my prints, that way they're the ones who have to maintain printers and not me.
 
I have been a pretty serious amature photographer since the late 1970's, so I'll throw a few tips out there.

$$ - How much are you willing to spend? Todays mega zoom, image stabilized point & shoot cameras can take very nice pictures, in most conditions. If your demands are not high, and you are more interested in "snap shot" quality photographs, they might work for you, especially if you are new to the game. As your experience grows, you will learn the fundamentals, and learn what features are important to you, and what you find to be lacking, because....

No point and shoot will ever equal the flexibility and picture quality of a good DSLR system. Features like sensor size, low light ability, shutter lag, FPS (frames per second), ability to auto focus quickly and accurately, track a moving subject, and much more, all favor the DSLR.

Many folks are attracted to the mega-zoom built in lenses in the point and shoots, but their picture quality, especially at any higher magnification is terrible compared to a good glass DSLR lens. Common sense should tell you that a $1500 DSLR lens that weighs a couple pounds is going to give you better pics than a usually plastic lens a fraction of the size and price will.

A quality DSLR set up will give you crisp landscapes, and is almost mandatory for good wildlife shots. In many situations, you can never have enough magnification for wildlife, especially birds. Todays DSLR's allow for quite a bit of cropping with little loss of quality. Try doing any serious cropping with a point and shoot...The results are usually pretty bad, and using the built in digital (not optical) zoom lens usually results in even worse results.

A Nikon shooter myself, if in your shoes, and looking for a very nice, mid priced set up that works for what you want, I would look at a D7500 (about $1200), a Nikon 200-500mm zoom (about $1300), and a Nikon 10-24 DX G lens (about $650). For the money, it would be just short of a full professional set up as far as performance, and the results would satisfy the most advanced amature.

And don't forget a good tripod (not a $39 special from Walmart) It makes all the difference in taking sharp photos, especially at magnification, where hand shake is magnified, even with the use of electronic vibration reduction. You'll notice the difference when a picture is cropped or enlarged / printed. The difference between a kind of blurry snap shots, and consistent razor sharp photographs makes all the difference to those who take their hobby seriously.

Larry
 
Nikon D90 here, mostly with an 18-200 zoom. There is an 18-300 zoom out now. Camera technology has advanced since I bought it though. A good idea might be to go to a book store and get a magazine on comparing digital cameras.
 
There is a member on another forum that posts some amazing pics in the gallery section there. He uses a Nikon 7200 and the pics are great.
 
Until about 1995, I had used various SLR 35mm cameras (mainly Nikon and Canon) for over 30 years, and always did my own darkroom work, both color and B&W. I also did some larger format work using 120 (Rolleiflex) and 4x5 film. I got my first (primitive) digital camera about that time, and pretty well went completely digital by the late 1990s. I eventually sold all of my film cameras and darkroom equipment for a small fraction of what I paid. At present, I use what many would call a pocket-sized point and shoot digital camera - a Nikon Coolpix L30 (20 Mp, 5X zoom). That camera, and Photoshop, allow me to do about anything I want, and at least as well as what I did with any film camera. I have thought frequently about buying a better-quality digital SLR camera, but my second thought is always "why do I need it?" My prediction is that it won't be long before all stand alone digital cameras will become as obsolete as film cameras because cell phone cameras are getting so good, and those are what almost everyone, except pros, will use in the future. Even my bottom-of-the-line Samsung cell phone which is over 5 years old produces pretty good images. And I always have it with me should the need arise to use it.
 
Last edited:
I'm a Nikon guy too. Never liked the button lay out of canon.

Camera bodies come and go, but good lens will last forever.

i-THPgK7p.jpg
 
Back
Top