Waiting for my buddy to send it so I can post it.How about a picture of the headstamp?
Makes sense. I'm wondering if "45" is the year and it is some sort of fantasy round made up from a milsurp round, like you said, during VN.Many of those early "key chain" cartridges, especially during the Viet Nam war era when they became popular, were made specifically for that purpose and only superficially resemble real cartridges. I suspect that is what this is.
The .45 headstamp obviously does not agree with the measured diameter of the bullet!
My buddy is an engineer so whatever he measured it with the dimensions are accurate.Did you measure with a caliper or a micrometer?
I think you're right, there's not even a flash hole in it and it looks too big anyway if that's a .45 shell...Looking at that primer pocket, I think that might have been made as a key chain and doesn't belong to any specific chamber.
I remember reading something about the British Military tests of the Mars pistol. In the final test report, there was a comment made to the effect that “Those who fired it once during the test could not be persuaded to fire it again.”The article on the Mars pistols is in the 1961 GUN DIGEST, "Mars Automatic Pistols" by Larry Sterett, a regular contributor to GD publications for many years. The article is long, maybe 4,500 words, and very detailed with footnotes. I just glanced at it.
Unless I missed something, it look like bullet diameters were 10mm (.394"), 9mm (.354"), 8.5 mm (.335"), .360", and .450". Photos show a depiction smilar to that shown in this thread but obviously not the same.
These cartridges in 1961 were incredibly scarce and the photos were taken of a few cartridges in the H.P. White Co. (remember them, the pressure people?) collection.
That the primer pocket lacks a flash hole indicates it wasn’t intended to be fired. Possibly for display, salesman’s sample, etc.