YIKES!! I thought the 6' rattler I killed a few years ago was pretty darn big. I cannot even imagine a 10'+ and 50lbs rattler....
Well, perhaps you can
imagine it, but that's as close to reality as you'll get. Let's put these absurd anecdotes to rest. The following quotes are from Laurence M. Klauber's
Rattlesnakes, the definitive reference work ---
"The eastern diamondback (
Crotalus adamanteus) is the largest of the rattlesnakes. Specimens exceeding seven feet in length are well authenticated, although I cannot claim to have measured one myself; and eight- and nine-foot snakes have been reported, possibly with some basis of truth.
Reviewing all the reports and statistics concerning the maximum size attained by this snake, I should guess that, while the average adult male measures five feet, very rarely the eastern diamondback does measure eight feet, give or take an inch or so."
"Rattlesnakes are heavy-bodied, that is, they are thick in proportion to length, when compared with most snakes... The thickness of a snake's body, whether in terms of diameter or circumference, does not lend itself to accurate measurement... By the length-weight relationship (useful only for rattlers in the wild) a seven-foot rattler would weigh about fifteen pounds, and and eight
-footer about twenty-three pounds. The heaviest rattler of which I have heard was a seven foot five inch western diamond said to have weighed twenty-four pounds."
So, there you have it: 50 and 90 pound rattlesnakes as recently reported here are BS, and the purported lengths of nine and ten feet are bogus as well (not to mention the erroneously cited habitats). A currently posted image shows an allegedly 90 pound Western Diamondback being thrust forward at the end of a Pilstrom tong, in defiance of gravity and human musculature --- ain't true/never could've happened. Why this BS gets passed along unquestioned baffles me, as does much else...