Captain freed!

Originally posted by esterroid:
I am delighted with the outcome...

obama deserves the benefit of the doubt on this one.
+1

Sometimes, it's enough to give the go ahead then get out of the way and let the professionals do their jobs.
 
Major Kudos to the snipers that made the three shots from one moving vessel to a smaller, moving vessel, out in the rolling ocean, probably with wind. Definatly unfavorable conditions.
According to Fox News the lifeboat was being towed 30 yards behind the Navy ship(calm center wake and no wind conditions). The 3 pirates made themselves visible, two through hatches and one in a window, so they had three head shots at the same time and took them. Not difficult shooting for guys of this caliber but great effort none the less. GO NAVY!

Bob
 
Thank God!

I was afraid that it would turn into another Iranian Hostege situation as we had during Carter's administration.

Well done Seals! Wecome back Captian!

Bob
 
Originally posted by bk43:
Major Kudos to the snipers that made the three shots from one moving vessel to a smaller, moving vessel, out in the rolling ocean, probably with wind. Definatly unfavorable conditions.
According to Fox News the lifeboat was being towed 30 yards behind the Navy ship(calm center wake and no wind conditions). The 3 pirates made themselves visible, two through hatches and one in a window, so they had three head shots at the same time and took them. Not difficult shooting for guys of this caliber but great effort none the less. GO NAVY!

Bob
More of a feat of will than skill. I'm surprised they were ALLOWED to do it.
 
Now it seems the hand wringers are upset that by shooting these pieces of sub-human detritus they may "usher in a completely worse situation by the pirates" . In other words, 'just give them what they want and maybe they'll like us and no one will get hurt'.

As my old man was wont to say, the world seems to be going to hell like a rock in a rain barrel . . . .

These murdering scum ( equivalent of street gangs on the water) are now threatening the sovereign United States and other countries with "revenge". We know where they are for the most part. Just send US marines. Just don't repeat the same mistake the last time a democrap president went after Somali thugs and not provide the support to do the job right.
 
Originally posted by NFrameFred:
Now it seems the hand wringers are upset that by shooting these pieces of sub-human detritus they may "usher in a completely worse situation by the pirates" . In other words, 'just give them what they want and maybe they'll like us and no one will get hurt'.

As my old man was wont to say, the world seems to be going to hell like a rock in a rain barrel . . . .

These murdering scum ( equivalent of street gangs on the water) are now threatening the sovereign United States and other countries with "revenge". We know where they are for the most part. Just send US marines. Just don't repeat the same mistake the last time a democrap president went after Somali thugs and not provide the support to do the job right.
Hey, we're throwing money at anything and anyone that can't run away these days. Just PAY the Ethiopians to attack from the land side while we attack from the sea, and WIPE THEM OUT.
 
Whether it was a .22 or a 50cal, dead is dead, but the caliber will determine the amount of cleaning required inside the lifeboat. I doubt much grey matter from these dummies anyway. Love those SEALS.
 
Just don't repeat the same mistake the last time a democrap president went after Somali thugs and not provide the support to do the job right.


Clinton only withdrew heavier armed troops after being pressured by Republicans to do so.

So how does that happen? Perhaps people like yourself who have to turn every thing into a partisan debate are the problem?

Emory
 
Cite your proof other than wishful thinking.

It's like the oft told lie that Clinton "balanced" the budget. Never happened.
 
They're letting the fourth pirate go... but he has to walk home.
icon_wink.gif
 
Originally posted by crofoot629:
Clinton only withdrew heavier armed troops after being pressured by Republicans to do so.
IIRC there was pressure from both sides of the aisle. However, it was Clinton who announced a unilateral six month withdrawal timeline.

The Annointed One and Iraq can be thought of as..... Draw your own conclusions.

Bob
 
Originally posted by crofoot629:
Just don't repeat the same mistake the last time a democrap president went after Somali thugs and not provide the support to do the job right.


Clinton only withdrew heavier armed troops after being pressured by Republicans to do so.

So how does that happen? Perhaps people like yourself who have to turn every thing into a partisan debate are the problem?

Emory
Not factually correct. The troops on the ground asked for US armored forces for support and were turned down by the Clinton administration. The Pakistanis(?) were supposed to provide support for the "Blackhawk Down" operation and failed to. A lot of good men died because of the collossal ineptitude of the Clinton administration.
 
down by the Clinton administration. The Pakistanis(?) were supposed to provide support for the "Blackhawk Down" operation and failed to. A lot of good men died because of the collossal ineptitude of the Clinton administration.

Close, you’ve almost got it.

After pressure months earlier to withdraw greater troop numbers, and then just prior to "The Blackawk Down" incident, Clinton denied the request of ground commanders for heavier armed troops. Clinton was under pressure from Republicans to limit, or end the operation all together prior to Blackhawk down, from Republicans. I know, hard to believe either Republicans or Democrats making political hey out of such events huh?

Neither party is above such tactics, I’m just saying call a spade a spade. This idea that either side is all good or all bad defies common sense and lacks any credibility.

Emory
 
Originally posted by NFrameFred:
Now it seems the hand wringers are upset that by shooting these pieces of sub-human detritus they may "usher in a completely worse situation by the pirates" .

Ya know......this may sound harsh but I (and many others I would wager) realy don't give a tub of camel vomit what the pirates or other hostages countries think about our actions. If the pirates decide to kill hostages in retaliation for our actions-let those hostages home countries do something about it-I'm tired of putting everyone first excepy US just because we are afraid of p!ssing someone off.
icon_mad.gif
 
Back
Top