Choices other than S&W model 17 (K-22)

[Florida Guy]

I've got 2 model 63's and thinking of buying a model 17 or something of similar size.
I'd like to know what other models in 22lr come in a K frame size.
I see the Taurus 94 is very reasonably priced but it seems to be a small frame gun.
All opinions are welcome.

 

[CAJUNLAWYER]

Model 18 model 617 both are K frame .22's The Ruger SP101 is a bit smaller than a K frame-a bit bigger than a J frame and holds 8 shots.
Me personally, these are the only double action revolvers I would look at (well also the model 17) in that frame size. I'd buy a single 10 before I bought a Rossi or Taurus.

 

[Florida Guy]

I like the 617 but it weighs in at 40 oz.
I'd like something a little lighter.
This would be shared with my sister, and she doesn't like the heavier guns.

 

[Smith357]

A Colt Officers Model Match or Official Police


Let the flames begin.

 

[DeathGrip]

We had a recent thread about the rising prices of .22 revolvers.

I'm looking but seem to find none when finances allow. I had to pass on a good deal to pay for excessive spending by smarter spenders than us. April 15 is always a pain.

Caj has some good advice if you don't mind his free fee.

 

[steamloco76]

The new Ruger SP-101 .22 isn't bad. Good sights, 8 shots and nice factory grips. It has an unnecessarily heavy trigger, however a couple of slightly lighter Wolff springs help that a lot. The Ruger Single Six and new Single 10 are very nice single action guns and not too heavy. Avoid the Taurus model 94! Every one I have handled had a horrendous trigger. The Taurus Tracker .22's aren't bad, but they are as heavy as a Smith 617.

 

[brucev]

I've got 2 model 63's and thinking of buying a model 17 or something of similar size.
I'd like to know what other models in 22lr come in a K frame size.
I see the Taurus 94 is very reasonably priced but it seems to be a small frame gun.
All opinions are welcome.

The J-frame .22 LR S&W's are fine handguns. A 17 is a fine revolver for the range and for hunting. A better choice IMHO is the Model 18. It offers very fine accuracy and superlative handling qualities. It is just exactly the right size for carry in the fields and woods. It is sufficiently heavy enough to allow effective use for small game hunting, etc. It has a very fine SA and DA trigger pull normal to the K-frame allowing one to place ones shots with accuracy and precision. JMHO. Sincerely. brucev.

 

[Florida Guy]

Thinking of a 6 inch that will be for range use only.
I would consider a m18 but it's not my first choice.
Taurus 94 is completely off the table.

 

[HAWKEYE10]

I have a model 17 and 18. Both are great and I wouldn't sell either. Why don't you get both? You know your going to anyway. Don

 

[tripledipper]

Those old Colt's are bringing in big bucks now aren't they, and the Diamondback is not even a passing thought for the average working guy. I had an older 94 which never gave me a problem but I guess I just got lucky. There are shooters out there in J & K, you just have to find one.

 

[Andy Griffith]

I've got a 17, 48, 22/32 and one of the new Taurus 992's.

The problem with the Taurus 94 is that it's on a small frame and the trigger just can't be made better. However, the large (k-frame equivalent) frame 992 which comes with both cylinders is a smooth, accurate piece with a wonderful trigger and shoots cheap high-velocity bulk ammo better than my old 17. If you don't want or need the magnum cylinder, try the 990.

I love my 17, and would like another, but they've lost their minds on pricing! I wager there is $300+ difference between the S&W 617 and the Taurus 990 in stainless new.

The other problem is trying to find a good, clean used one at a reasonable price if you want to go that route.

 

[Florida Guy]

I've got a 17, 48, 22/32 and one of the new Taurus 992's.

The problem with the Taurus 94 is that it's on a small frame and the trigger just can't be made better. However, the large (k-frame equivalent) frame 992 which comes with both cylinders is a smooth, accurate piece with a wonderful trigger and shoots cheap high-velocity bulk ammo better than my old 17. If you don't want or need the magnum cylinder, try the 990.

I love my 17, and would like another, but they've lost their minds on pricing! I wager there is $300+ difference between the S&W 617 and the Taurus 990 in stainless new.

The other problem is trying to find a good, clean used one at a reasonable price if you want to go that route.

Thanks.... I'm going to check out the 990.
Just looked, and 6.5" weighs in at 43 oz. which is more than either the m617 or m17 or 18.
The 4" is more reasonable @ 38 oz.
Trying to let my sis also use this one. I will check into it further to see if it fits my needs.
Thanks for the suggestion.

 

[fat tom]

The model 63's you have sound like they fit your situation best,especially since you've pretty much ruled out the other Smith K-frames. Therefore,I will second Smith357's suggestion of the Colt Officer's Model Target. It's for sure it ain't no Taurus.

f.t.

 

[26Ford]

Next to a Smith, I would chose the Ruger SP-101, very nice revolver!! 26

 

[Smith357]

No one has mentioned the H&R Sportsman line of Top Break DA revolvers. While not a pretty as a Colt or Smith they are nowhere near as expensive either being widely available under the $300 mark. I would buy an old H&R in a second over any Taurus, Charter Arms, or Rossi.

 

[ikor]

Bite the bullet and get a real M17...you will be glad you did.

 

[LouisianaJoe]

I have a H&R model 905. This is a 9 shot 4" bull barrel and mine is an excellent shooter.

I saw one on GunsAmerica for $275

 

[pawncop]

Another vote for looking at the H&R's. High Standard made a couple for fairly nice revolvers back in "the day".

 

[Texan]

After you shoot a S&W model 17 I don't think any other gun will do.
A model 18 or 617 is as close as it gets, IMO.

But for lugging around in the woods a model 63 is much better..
lighter, and much easier to pack whether in a holster or backpack.

Texan