Going thru my stuff I took a look at this Civil War Sword by Ames. I have seen the exact same sword on display at Gettysburg a few years ago with General Meade's uniform. I have it tagged as an 1851 US Field and Calvary Sword. Am I correct?
Apropos of the curved cavalry swords from the Civil War era, I have read that they were intended more for bludgeoning an enemy — e.g, breaking his collar bone, rendering him senseless with a head blow — rather than, say, cutting off or into body parts.It is not a cavalry sword. The blade is straight.
Apropos of the curved cavalry swords from the Civil War era, I have read that they were intended more for bludgeoning an enemy — e.g, breaking his collar bone, rendering him senseless with a head blow — rather than, say, cutting off or into body parts.
Would be interesting to learn of 19th Century cavalry saber training.
Prior to WWI George Patton was in the Calvary. He redesigned the Calvary saber and the new design was accepted by the Army. Still the same design today.
Model 1913 Cavalry Saber - Wikipedia
The edges of cavalry sabers were purposely left unsharpened for that reason. The appearance of revolvers during and after the Civil War made sabers unnecessary for cavalry use other than ceremonial.Apropos of the curved cavalry swords from the Civil War era, I have read that they were intended more for bludgeoning an enemy — e.g, breaking his collar bone, rendering him senseless with a head blow — rather than, say, cutting off or into body.
Cavalry carried curved sabers That is ceremonial senior officers sword.[/QUOTo
Curved blades were slashing.
Straight ones were for impaling.