Classic Old Shotgun

This is a Pandora's box of sorts. I'm a big fan of classic SXS shotguns and there the only shotguns I have. I've been the rout with the Belgian made A 5"s and M12's. To me there is no better classic semi auto than a Browning A5 made in Belgium just as there is no finer pump gun than a M12.
If you want to go with a SXS determine if you want a 12 or a small bore. The 16's (my favorite) can be hard to find ammo for (I reload and it's all 2 1/2 inch shells) the 20 will cost significantly more than a 12. Determine your budget which will help direct you to either a 12 or a 20. Remember these are old guns, the last Parker was made shortly before WW2. It's not so much the metal but the woods age and especially if the head of the stock has become oil soaked. I never shoot high pressure modern ammo in ANY of my vintage shotguns from Parker, Fox, LeFever or any of the English guns I have. I shoot a lot of Damascus barreled guns but they have good wall thickness and I use low pressure ammunition. Classic shotguns are just that classics and need to be treated as such.
 
Just yesterday was looking at an old Ranger 30 that was calling my name ($150!) Love the double-hump looks.

There was also a later 520 (single-hump) for $250.

Alas, saving for other things…
 
Last edited:
If it is going to be more of a user than a collectable, you might want to try shooting a SxS first. Some shooters have a problem with the double barrel sight picture, and do better with the single sighting plane of an O/U. Bear in mind the ability to hit consistently with a shotgun is proper stock fit.

Owned a Superposed from the 1950's in 12 ga, 28 inch. Quality gun that I only sold when offered a stupid amount. Still have the 12 ga Auto-5 that was my uncles duck gun after the Korean war. Gifted to me as a young man, it is probably my most fired shotgun, and still 100% reliable. Balance is good, recoil impulse not bad once you get used to it.

If you are a "project" kind of guy, I might look for an earlier 311 with good metal - no rust, barrel dents, etc. Buy a slightly oversized 90% finished walnut stock with some pretty grain. Fit the action, then pattern / test it out for proper fit. Lower / thin the comb as needed until it hits right on for you. Give it a nice oil finish, and maybe drop a few $$ for some nice checkering, and you would have a gun you could take a lot of pride in for not a ton of $$.

If your definition of a classic shotgun includes a Japanese made gun from the 1960's or so, SKB (Imported by Ithaca) shotguns are extremely well made, and usually do not bring the $$ some others do, while being just as nice, sometimes better. My go to Pheasant gun these days is a 1960's Ithaca import 12 ga SKB O/U with pretty engraving and wood.

Larry
 
Last edited:
I disagree.......My mdl 12's ad 97's from 1918 and 1919 DO NOT require a "turkey neck " to shoot..........Neither does the A5...Nor the Remingtons or Savages....None are stocked short...Mount-cheek down.....Look down the barrel and shoot.
Where did that cokamamy idea come from????????

My 1904 Win 97 LOP is 3/4: shorter than my 1954 97. Almost that much difference drop at the toe also.

My brother collects old Parkers and LC Smiths but for shooting, he has them restocked to modern dimensions. When the Reproduction Parkers were on the market 15-20 years ago, ALL OF THEM had modern dimension stocks! It isn't a "cockamamie" idea, most modern Americans are Taller, longer armed and fatter than our 1900-1935 predecessors.

5'7" was the average WWI Army, Navy and Marines ran a little shorter. 5'6" was the normal WWII GI. 5'11" is the current average.

I like the way my short 97 handles, but I always score better with a longer length of pull!

Ivan
 
If you want a shotgun principally for hunting, weight balance and how well it fits you are the primary issues. Make, model, age, and type (pump, semiauto, SxS double, O/U) are secondary considerations.
 
So many choices.

If diving into the American 'Classics' as listed.
The AH Fox and the Ithaca 'NID Model' will give you least amount of troubles as far as mechanics.
Be assured they can breakdown and wear out. But they are easiest to fix& restore mechanically even counting the ejector mechanisms if your gun happens to have them.

Factory Single Selective Trigger (SST) mechanisms on either can be a nightmare to make them work correctly if they are out of order. Especially if someone has chosen to get in there and 'adjust them' somehow,

This statement about SST's on double bbl guns goes for any trigger mechanism out there.
The LCSmith is about the worst to work on, The Parker next.
Even the highly praised Winchester 21 SST gives more than it's share of troubles.
I have fixed more Win21 triggers in the last 10yrs than all the others together I think. But that may be just because more 21's are used at the range where I shoot than any other classic SxS or OU.
I usually get the gun brought to me by the sad faced owner , 'Can you fix this?
Never one particular issue with any of then. Can be Doubling, FTFire R or L bbl,,Selector doesn't work,,Works R/L or L/R but not the other way around,,or the best one 'It doesn't do it all the time, just sometimes..'.

Double triggers are the Classic set up and are just about flawless as are extractors. That's a hint.

LCSmith guns are fragile in the stock head and many are cracked or cracked and repaired. Heavier loads than the guns were designed for is sometimes the problem. Oil soaked wood another issue.

If you've ever seen how little stock wood actually supports the frame for recoil you'll understand the problem.
The firing pins break fairly often or get peened over at the back end but thats usually from dry firing. The pre-1913 guns will break the FP bushings in the breech face from the same. Just don't dry-fire.
Don't dis-assemble the trigger plate and unleash the top lever V spring unless you really know how to reassemble the frame and plate against that spring tension.
The LCS can get loose/off face like any of them. None are a solid lock up 'For Ever' no matter what the old marketing ads say.
Stuff wears out and has to be rebuilt.
Most is expensive restoritive work.
Don't look for a money pit unless you do the work yourself or are wealthy.

Parkers are very nice. Overly complicated. About a bucket too many small parts inside to make it work the same as an AH Fox. But you won't get any complaints from the Parker fans.
The Ejectors if it has them are also one of the most complicated systems on these USA guns. V spring powered and the rest of the parts are complicated shapes as well.
There's not much more than parts replacement to be done when things break inside the ejector mech & there's not a lot of orig parts around anymore. Some of Parker Repro parts fit as did the Repro SST parts. But they are hard to find now too and pricey.

AH Fox is about the easist to work on, IMO.
No difference inside betw a Sterlingworth and an FE/Special grade.
The Sterlingworth used a snap on forend. The 'Graded Guns' (A-F) used a latch forend.
Sterlingworth ejector guns used a small round escutcheon on the outside of the forend as reinforcement.

The later Fox Model B was a product of Savage Arms Co just after WW2.
The Steven 311 came out just after the Fox Model B was shown.
So the Stevens 311 is actually a plain version of the first announced Fox Model B.
There was an earlier Model 311,,The Springfield 311.
That was made by the orig Stevens Arms Co before WW1 and continued to be made by Savage after WW1 when they acquired ownership of Stevens Arms.
The Springfield Model 311 was built on the old coil spring/straight line striker action.
That was discontinued at WW2.
The Fox Model B and then the Steven 311 with their internal rotating hammers came out just after WW2

Early Ithaca models are somewhat fragil when compared to the last SxS they made,,the NID Model.
The earlier Flues (1912-1925) was a popular SxS but it has a habit of breaking the top of the stock ears off because of the stock to frame attachment design. There's no top tang through bolt in the gun to pull the frame together around the wood. The top tang screw that is in the gun is mearly a stubby wood screw about 5/16" long, and usually stipped at this point in life.
The frame rolls upward slightly in recoil and batters the top of the stock/ears and cracks. The rear of the tang usualy cracks the stock as well.
The Frames are thin on the sides and the breech and was done purposely to make a lightweight gun in most cases.
Quite a few have suffered cracked frames verticaly from the junction of the standing breech straight down the side of the frame on the outside.
Easily seen.
The sharp cornered cut betw the breech face and the action flat didn't help matters.

Flues Ejectors are somewhat of a pain. But they can generally be made to function OK w/o any great investment in parts..just labor. They are fragile and touchy.

A good condition Flues if used with light loads can be a very nice gun. Abuse it with todays OTC stuff and it will not react kindly.
Seeing the Mfg'r dates, you can guess that most are short chambered that incluses the 12,16 &20.
They were made in 28 and 410 as well and offered in Damascus as well as Steel bbls.

The original Syracuse Lefever is a Box-Lock action. The side(lock)plates are just ,,side plates.
I wouldn't recommend an orig Lefever unless in VG -Excl condition to anyone as a gun to start out with. They are complicated and are very expensive to have worked on if you can find someone that can.

Ithaca bought out the Syracuse Lefever Arms Co. For a very short time Ithaca assembled some of the old Syracuse Lefever style side plate Lefevers. They are marked Ithaca/ Lefever Arms Co on the side.

The vast majority of Ithaca Lefevers guns people are familiar with are the
Lefever 'Nitro Special' SxS guns.
These are plain box-lock utility shotguns 12,16,20,and 410ga.
A couple different minor changes in frame shape but essencially stayed the same.
Good solid shotguns. No frills in the standard gun. But they could be gotten with some options.

A step up was the Lefever A Grade (Nitro Special)
This had a better shaped stock, checkering, coukld be had with ejectors, Single Non-Selective Trigger.
A few editions within the series included a Skeet gun and I believe a Trap.
I had a 20ga Skeet. Twin Ivory bead sights, ejectors and the SNST.

The Nitro Specials hold up well and are easily repaired if they need it. Parts abound it seems on places like Ebay and such.

With any of the older SxS's, give them a good look over for the standard issues. Loose ribs, Off-Face/Loose lock-up, Check the lock-up with the forend off the gun. Check trigger pulls (too light/too heavy), Saftey work?, Cracked stock or forend, Working ejectors, Single Trigger mechanisms.
Check chamber length. Have the chambers been lengthened?, forcing cones lengthened. Bore specs,,bore dia, Wall thickness, choke dia's.

Some of this takes some tools and instruments to check, all of it takes some knowledge and experience.
Learn, read and take someone knowledgeable with you when shopping for a shootable vintage SxS.
There are lots of them out there, there are many that have been worked over, and not in a good way.
 
Last edited:
No pictures yet......
As an aside some of the old guns came with nice sticks.
The trap guns in particular
 

Attachments

  • 20240711_142211.jpg
    20240711_142211.jpg
    69.9 KB · Views: 23
  • 20230623_052144.jpg
    20230623_052144.jpg
    54.4 KB · Views: 19
  • 20200618_151742.jpg
    20200618_151742.jpg
    46.9 KB · Views: 18
  • 20240120_121856.jpg
    20240120_121856.jpg
    80.3 KB · Views: 15
How much are you planning to shoot? And what type of shooting: birds, clays, back yard toss'ems? Do bragging rights factor into the equation? Is gage important to you (yes, I know everyone loves the 12, but, options exist for additional fun.) Mechanically inclined? You will be if you buy a classic. Or broke.
My vote goes to LC Smith 16 gage. I had one for years. Sweetest SXS I ever pulled up. I learned to NEVER disassemble without the aid of good gunsmith schooled in LC Smith work.
Answer some of those questions and you will be half way to happiness.
My two...
 
Crescent Empire - Another Suggestion

Your list is all SxS's except Browning Superposed. Responders have weighed in with all manner of suggestions for auto and pump repeaters. If you were to stick to your SxS criteria you would come upon a nice Crescent Empire for a far lower price point than the other SxS makers you have listed. Crescent is a classic working man's gun and a true sidelock with intercepting sear locks. The brands you list are getting pricey if in good shootable condition, as will a Crescent, but at half the market price. Personally, I would not have an L.C. Smith due to the absence of interrupting sear triggers, even though it is a sidelock. After all this blabber you should be opportunistically driven. Buy what you find in good shape at your price point.
 
You might try an Ansley Fox.
Pic of my 1923 AE 12 gauge with English stock and automatic ejectors.
Experts would probably say it doesn't fit me very well. Upland birds I've shot with it would say that evidently doesn't matter.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3578.jpg
    IMG_3578.jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_3577.jpg
    IMG_3577.jpg
    45.8 KB · Views: 18
When we get old enough, quite a few things show up on the "You can never go wrong with…" list. On my list a Browning Superposed will always have a spot way up there. (A nice A5 too, but it would be behind the Super on the list a ways.) I don't have any side-by-sides on my list because I'm a terrible hand with one. I've shot over-unders too long. :o

Of course if you're determined to buy a double, you have to look elsewhere. Years ago, when I might have been trainable, I wanted one of the Parker reproductions in 20- or 28-gauge, but I couldn't scratch up the money. (Yes, I know the reproduction guns are virtually blasphemy to diehard Parker collectors. :o)

Don't scratch off the Superposed without giving it some serious thought. :)
 
Your going to spend big bucks on a quality vintage SXS thats in great condition and they take a little time to get use to shooting them fast and accurately. I had a Spanish Ugartechea that was absolutely beautiful with the green lined leather case and like most doubles, was a 12 ga. bored modified and full with a checkered wood butt plate, ouch! I loved shooting it but was wanting a 20 gauge IC/modified and they are pricey so I bought this Yildiz from Academy Sports in 20 with removeable chokes, awesome gun for the money.

Yildiz 12 Gauge Side-By-Side Shotgun | Academy
 
I like O/Us by Browning. The two Superposes (both are Lightning models) are fixed choke, The 12 is F/F 30" (1963) and the 20 is M/F 28" (1965) neither had "Salt Wood".

I have a 425 12 30", a 425 20 28", a Superlight 20 26" Fixed, a Superlight 28 26" Fixed Grade VI, a Feather XS 28 30", a feather XS 410 30" and a 725 410 32". If you reload as I do the 28s and 410s are an absolute joy to shoot. The balance of cost, weight, and recoil (for the non reloader) 20 gauge is the ultimate expierance. My personal high score (44/50) was with my 425 20 gauge and that stood for almost 30 years! I broke it a few years ago, after not firing only 28 and 410 for 8 years. I entered a Sporting Clays League and used my wife's Berretta 390 Sporting in 20 gauge and had a 45. I think if I had been shooting my 28 Feather XS I would have cleaned the course! In that league for the 10 weeks I came in 4th overall, and was the only 20 gauge, everyone else was a 12 of on type or another. (AA 20 Sporting 7.5's every week)

I don't think you can go wrong with any gauge; the small gauges take more practice to get proficient. Just don't get a 28 or 410 with Full/Full fixed chokes!

Ivan
 
If you want to go with a SXS determine if you want a 12 or a small bore. The 16's (my favorite) can be hard to find ammo for (I reload and it's all 2 1/2 inch shells) the 20 will cost significantly more than a 12.
Seems like the price goes up as the bore diameter gets smaller. My three Savage doubles are a 12, 16, and 20 gauge, and like you said the 20 was the most expensive (and is the oldest of my three). I 've only found three .410 bore Savage doubles and they were all at least twice what I paid for the 20 gauge. I couldn't see my way clear to paying that. I can understand a bit of an increase, they are more rare as fewer were made.

The later Fox Model B was a product of Savage Arms Co just after WW2.
The Steven 311 came out just after the Fox Model B was shown.
So the Stevens 311 is actually a plain version of the first announced Fox Model B.
There was an earlier Model 311,,The Springfield 311.
That was made by the orig Stevens Arms Co before WW1 and continued to be made by Savage after WW1 when they acquired ownership of Stevens Arms.
The Springfield Model 311 was built on the old coil spring/straight line striker action.
That was discontinued at WW2.
The Fox Model B and then the Steven 311 with their internal rotating hammers came out just after WW2
The reference I have says the Fox B went into production in 1940, capitalizing on the "Fox" portion of the AH Fox guns, which Savage purchased in 1929. AH Fox's last catalog was 1942, but guns were produced through the end of WWII from remaining inventory. The 311 that the Fox B was "upgraded" from was in production in 1931. Both the Stevens 311 and the Fox B use an identical action and most parts are interchangeable.

Savage/Fox Model B Side-by-Side Shotguns
[/QUOTE]

With any of the older SxS's, give them a good look over for the standard issues. Loose ribs, Off-Face/Loose lock-up, Check the lock-up with the forend off the gun. Check trigger pulls (too light/too heavy), Saftey work?, Cracked stock or forend, Working ejectors, Single Trigger mechanisms.
Check chamber length. Have the chambers been lengthened?, forcing cones lengthened. Bore specs,,bore dia, Wall thickness, choke dia's.
Agreed, you can many times find a nice looking double that has hidden issues. Both my 16 and 20 gauge doubles had issues with intermittent failures to fire on the right barrel. Both problems were traced to worn out firing pins, a simple fix if you can find the parts on these older guns. Old doubles used for hunting generally got a lot more use on the right barrel, as the right barrel choke is generally more open on those with fixed chokes than the left, which was intended for a second shot at longer range.

I shoot all three of my old Fox B's, but the 16 and 20 get far less use than the 12, mainly because of ammo cost. However, the 12 gets a lot of skeet, 5-stand and clays use and I've put over 200 rounds through mine in a single day without seeing any issues with the gun loosening up. I've had the barrels too hot to touch many times. It was a challenge at first, getting used to shooting modified and full choke barrels on a skeet range, but it makes you a better shot once you get your lead right. Nothing more satisfying than turning the second shot in a double to powder.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the responses guys! I've really enjoyed reading everybody's thoughts….lots of knowledge here bout more than just smiths! Anyway, to answer a question that has come up….I'll shoot this gun some, but I've got numerous other shotguns to play with too….I've got a couple of Remington 1100s that fit me like a glove, and they are my go to guns. This gun will go hunting a couple times a year, backyard clays a couple times a year, but mostly just full what I perceive is a hole in my collection.

Not all that much has been said about the Superposed. I'd like to hear some more about your experiences with them.
 
Here are a couple of mine. A Parker VHE 28ga skeet gun, Gunner's Gun a custom build on a Parker VH 20 and a LeFever Optimus 16ga
 

Attachments

  • VHE 28.jpg
    VHE 28.jpg
    121.9 KB · Views: 9
  • VHE 28-2.jpg
    VHE 28-2.jpg
    95 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0732.jpg
    IMG_0732.jpg
    79.2 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0740.JPG
    IMG_0740.JPG
    215.3 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_0848.JPG
    IMG_0848.JPG
    66.2 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
The Connecticut Shotgun Co was mentioned in an earlier post. I've had this Fox FE 410 for years and never had an issue with it.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0177.jpg
    IMG_0177.jpg
    143.5 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_0178.jpg
    IMG_0178.jpg
    133.1 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_0179.jpg
    IMG_0179.jpg
    83.8 KB · Views: 7
  • IMG_0181.jpg
    IMG_0181.jpg
    147.8 KB · Views: 8
Back
Top