lafayne
Member
Charlie,
I will be turning 70 in January and I still shoot a lot. I have the 1894 in .357 which I bought to just shoot for fun and carry in the woods. I only load jacketed bullets for it and it feeds very well. As you will note when you operate the lever, the hump on the bottom of the bolt must ride over the hammer while opening and closing the action. I polished these surfaces and it slicked up a lot. Also, the lever has that little spring loaded, chisel faced plunger to retain the lever closed and it got a little polishing attention also.
I like the rifle and it shoots well. I also have a Marlin 1893 that belonged to my dad. It was originally a 30-30 with a ruined bore and I installed a new Numrich Arms 38-55 barrel on it about 1962 or so. I shoots very well and is a LOT smoother.
I understand why some would want a quality action job done to smooth up the newer rifles.
Ken
I will be turning 70 in January and I still shoot a lot. I have the 1894 in .357 which I bought to just shoot for fun and carry in the woods. I only load jacketed bullets for it and it feeds very well. As you will note when you operate the lever, the hump on the bottom of the bolt must ride over the hammer while opening and closing the action. I polished these surfaces and it slicked up a lot. Also, the lever has that little spring loaded, chisel faced plunger to retain the lever closed and it got a little polishing attention also.
I like the rifle and it shoots well. I also have a Marlin 1893 that belonged to my dad. It was originally a 30-30 with a ruined bore and I installed a new Numrich Arms 38-55 barrel on it about 1962 or so. I shoots very well and is a LOT smoother.
I understand why some would want a quality action job done to smooth up the newer rifles.
Ken