Have gun-will travel
Member
I would like to have a commander size 1911 in 357 SIG

Last edited:
I would like to have a commander size 1911 in 357 SIG![]()
Why? Why would you want to take on all the problems of a bottle-neck handgun cartridge when the same platform is available in a cartridge that will out-perform it, the 10 MM?
Many people just hate the 357 Sig, that's the bottom line. I believe it's more hated than the 9mm. Anytime I've ever seen it brought up you have people jumping in saying something that doesn't make much sense.![]()
The 357 mag that was 95% one shot stops was a 125 gr jhp at 1450 fps. Factory 357 sig winchester ammo is a 125 gr jhp at 1350 to 1400 fps depending on barrel length.and at$25.00 a box at your local Wal-Mart it is cheaper than 357mag ($36.00 bx).Muzzel blast is less than mag and so is the recoil .As far as reloading goes I have never had any trouble reloading it at all.Sounds to me like you have been listening to a bunch of little wimps not real men that don't mind muzzel blast and recoil.I shoot a S&W M&P compact in 357 SIG ,Probably have close to 1500 rounds through it (some are 95 gr jhp's @1600 fps) and not the first problem and no excessive wear.So next time someone downgrades it tell them to MAN UP and quit whinning.It'd take a good while to list all the reasons I've heard. Too light, too fast, not fast enough, needlessly powerful, not powerful enough, too much blast, too much recoil, stole the mags name, not as good as the magnum, too expensive, too hard to reload, too hard to find, too hard on guns, the .357 mag wasn't very good, etc.
Many of the complaints are things the Sig was never intended. Such as: No it's not as versatile as the mag but you can't stuff a dozen+ mags in a 9mm sized gun. The second part always gets left out but it can't be ignored.
Depending on the load, the 38 Super isn't much different.