Hi Folks,
As an informed but not expert accumulator of S&W wheel-guns, I saw a very nice Model 27 that I would have really liked to have. It would have filled a gap in my little family of S&Ws. The barrier was that there were deep scratches in the cylinder crane pivot, in front of the trigger guard. It looked like someone used a brick for a benchrest.
The question is: In the case of isolated damage to an otherwise desirable piece, that in my opinion could be repaired by a qualified source, is it better to have the repairs made, or leave the offending damage as is?
For my own enjoyment, if I had a piece that was damaged like this, I would have the repairs made. But my question is from the point of view of the affect on "collectible value" - as is or as repaired.
Thanks for your info. I have learned an awful lot by reading the responses in this forum.
SD
As an informed but not expert accumulator of S&W wheel-guns, I saw a very nice Model 27 that I would have really liked to have. It would have filled a gap in my little family of S&Ws. The barrier was that there were deep scratches in the cylinder crane pivot, in front of the trigger guard. It looked like someone used a brick for a benchrest.
The question is: In the case of isolated damage to an otherwise desirable piece, that in my opinion could be repaired by a qualified source, is it better to have the repairs made, or leave the offending damage as is?
For my own enjoyment, if I had a piece that was damaged like this, I would have the repairs made. But my question is from the point of view of the affect on "collectible value" - as is or as repaired.
Thanks for your info. I have learned an awful lot by reading the responses in this forum.
SD