While I've been around guns all my life, I have not shopped for a concealed handgun until recently, and my experience so far, coupled with what I've read on this and other forums, makes me wonder if we're doing some of this wrong.
How many times have you read a post where the fellow said something like, "I bought this gun, and it ended up not really feeling right," or "I sent away for this holster, but it's too big/small or doesn't fit the gun or doesn't quite fit the belt right, or the belt is wrong."
I go to one of the big local independent gun stores and customers are three-deep at the counter, racking slides and talking with harried salespeople who honestly could not possibly be experts on all of the necessary pieces of a complete concealed carry package.
In the end, it seems that most folks go through a long and expensive period of trial and error, ending up with multiple pieces of weaponry and assorted merchandise that did not end up being what they thought of or hoped for, and finally arriving at that combination of gun and holster and cartridges and belt that make sense for them (or, more likely, several different combinations, depending on the season and the clothing being worn). Seems inefficient. Does it have to be this way?
If we were designing the best possible defensive handgun shop (one that sold all of the accessories), what would it look like? How would it differ from the shops and processes we use today?
How many times have you read a post where the fellow said something like, "I bought this gun, and it ended up not really feeling right," or "I sent away for this holster, but it's too big/small or doesn't fit the gun or doesn't quite fit the belt right, or the belt is wrong."
I go to one of the big local independent gun stores and customers are three-deep at the counter, racking slides and talking with harried salespeople who honestly could not possibly be experts on all of the necessary pieces of a complete concealed carry package.
In the end, it seems that most folks go through a long and expensive period of trial and error, ending up with multiple pieces of weaponry and assorted merchandise that did not end up being what they thought of or hoped for, and finally arriving at that combination of gun and holster and cartridges and belt that make sense for them (or, more likely, several different combinations, depending on the season and the clothing being worn). Seems inefficient. Does it have to be this way?
If we were designing the best possible defensive handgun shop (one that sold all of the accessories), what would it look like? How would it differ from the shops and processes we use today?