DID "MEET THE PRESS VIOLATE WASHINGTON D.C. LAW"?

[Moonman]

A high capacity magazine (30 round) was shown to Wayne on the show.

Was the prop a violation of DC high capacity magazine ordinance, as most shows are in DC?

Does NBC even care about Laws or Privacy when it doesn't suit their fancy or agenda?

 

[duppie]

If the mag was intact and by that I mean a fully functioning 30 rounder, he most certainly did.I fully expect that the investigation by DC's police to report that the mag was pinned or a prop as the news agency had ample time to alter or swap the mag after the questions came up, that is if it is even legal to possess a mag of that type in DC to begin with.

I'm irked because we here in NJ would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for possessing a unpinned 30 round mag and our firearms taken away but also banned from ever legally owning firearms again.

 

[2hawk]

We can only hope for equal application of the law in this case.

DC Police Investigating NBC's Gregory for Brandishing Illegal Magazine

DC MPD responded to an inquiry, saying that NBC had asked for permission to use the magazine, and that they (MPD) had said , "No". If that is the case I hope they treat him just as they have treated other DC residents in violation of their ridiculous statutes. It would be nice if Mr. Gregory got to experience first hand how capricious the law is on guns.

And, what I think is really great about this, is that Gregory perfectly illustrated how making something like a 30 round magazine illegal has absolutely no impact on someone's ability to acquire one. Good job, David Gregory!

 

[mudcat100]

David Gregory

Seems David Gregory may had an illegal 30 roung mag.on Meet The Press this past Sunday.It will be interesting to see if any charges are filed.

 

[wbraswell]

And what do you think would have happened to Wayne LaPierre if he was the one who had the mag?

 

[Black_Sheep]

He is a member of the media elite, nothing will become of it...

 

[The Big D]

Really dumb idea.

This case will be interesting. Gregory is apparently in violation of the law.

I have tried to recall another circumstance(s) wherein a reporter has been in possession of contraband without being charged. I daresay there have been instances of reporting when the reporter is in "constructive possession" of contraband. (e.g. First on scenes of recovered illegal drugs.)

Frankly, I think Gregory will argue lack of "criminal intent."

Whether he is charged will depend on the prosecutor. If he is charged his guilt/innocence will be the responsibility of the judge/jury.

In any case, Gregory and his producer(s) were certainly guilty of stupidity and/or ignorance. I have no sympathy for him/them and none whatsoever for the true owner of that illegal magazine.

 

[Biginge]

Big D,

I have no criminal intent with mine either. I really think herein lies the Whole issue of a ban.

 

[2hawk]

Well Said!

Big D,

I have no criminal intent with mine either. I really think herein lies the Whole issue of a ban.

That's it in a nutshell. Gun or magazine bans are like "pre-crime". Assumptions of criminal potential are the driving force for the current BS, and completely disregards all legal use, focusing instead on the statistically minuscule misuse.

 

[cp1969]

Big D,

I have no criminal intent with mine either. I really think herein lies the Whole issue of a ban.

EXACTLY. Your intentions count for nothing; the liberal elites' intentions count for everything.

 

[2hawk]

Can't confirm, but..

Posted on another forum, this is reportedly the email from DC MPD:

E-mail response:

"From: "DC Police (imailagent)" <[email protected]>
Subject: Email from DC Police (Intranet Quorum IMA00519327)
Date: December 24, 2012 4:13:12 PM EST
To: (<EDITED OUT>)


The Metropolitan Police Department is in receipt of your e-mail regarding David Gregory segment on "Meet the Press." MPD has received numerous e-mails informing us of the segment. NBC contacted MPD inquiring if they could utilize a high capacity magazine for their segment. NBC was informed that possession of a high capacity magazines is not permissible and their request was denied. This matter is currently being investigated. Thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to our attention.

Customer Service - Metropolitan Police Department"

 

[2hawk]

Now on CNN...

TRENDING: Washington D.C. police investigating whether NBC moderator violated law – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

 

[The Big D]

Not sure you understand. If such high capacity magazines are legal in your state "intent" is not a concern for you or the other posters who appear similarly confused.

If the magazine Gregory had in his hand was, in fact, "real," he is in violation of the law. He now needs a defense.

With hope of helping you understand "intent," how do you think LEO's can convey/possess/sell drugs or other contraband? They lack "criminal intent."

No, it's not a simple concept; it may be Gregory's only out, however. With that in mind, someone owns the magazine (again, if real) and that person is guilty...in my opinion...and according to DC law.

Again, "intent" is not an issue lacking a violation of the law. Hope this helps.

Be safe.

Big D,

I have no criminal intent with mine either. I really think herein lies the Whole issue of a ban.

 

[Biginge]

Big D,

I am not trying to do anything other than prove a point. A law abiding owner of a 30rd. mag and the AR that receives it has no "intent' of rendering harm or havoc either.

I am only trying to show the absolute failings of a ban on either item that is imminently facing us currently.

In no way was I inferring anything other than the "hyprocisy" of a ban. It is entirely possible that David Gregory just did more for the NRA than anyone would have ever thought possible.

I had "no intent", just may well be the new war cry of Gunowners all across America!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Perhaps a new NRA slogan. Probably not but it could happen.

 

[2hawk]

......

Again, "intent" is not an issue lacking a violation of the law. Hope this helps.

Be safe.

Check out the BATFE ruling about a shoelace being proof of "constructive intent" to make an illegal machine gun. I see your point, but when guns are subject to regulation that is promogulated by a govt. entity instead of elected officials, the door is open of all sorts of interpretation.

 

[2hawk]

And one more, just for laughs...

 

[The Big D]

Understood, Bill. No worries here.

Be safe.

Big D,

I am not trying to do anything other than prove a point. A law abiding owner of a 30rd. mag and the AR that receives it has no "intent' of rendering harm or havoc either.

I am only trying to show the absolute failings of a ban on either item that is imminently facing us currently.

In no way was I inferring anything other than the "hyprocisy" of a ban.

 

[PALADIN85020]

I understand David Gregory will not be hosting Meet the Mess this coming Sunday. One can only speculate on why...

John

 

[The Big D]

Not aware of that ruling but will try to find the cite. Thanks for the info...and no argument from me.

Be safe.

Check out the BATFE ruling about a shoelace being proof of "constructive intent" to make an illegal machine gun. I see your point, but when guns are subject to regulation that is promogulated by a govt. entity instead of elected officials, the door is open of all sorts of interpretation.

 

[2hawk]

Shoestring Machine Gun

So, for anyone out there with shoelaces, and a semi-auto rifle with a charging handle, I suggest you immediately change all your footwear to pull on or velcro attachment. We need to get rid of these evil shoelaces!