I agree fellas and thanks for posting. The zoom thing can be confusing and it is also borderline scam the way they promote it...digital zoom is not what you are after. The pictures zoom up alright but quickly become "pixelated." Optical zoom is what counts if you need zoom.
The Panasonic with the Leica lens was the one I had and it took amazing pictures for what it was. If that camera would have been weatherproof I seriously wouldn't need another camera for a good long time.
The technology is changing fast, I get that and it is a good thing at the end of the day. But it sure causes a lot of confusion and "re-education" in between. I remember 15 years ago, my father {a big photography buff} saying to my wife, "these digital things will never take over...you will never get the razor sharpness out of them like you can film...you just will never be able to ge tthem to that point..." I am sure some folks still use them, but now, I don't know where to even find a film camera except maybe in a museum...haven't seen one since my dads.
Matto, I get what you are saying...I just cant get it in my head that these days with today's technology and especially prices, someone that wants/needs to take pictures has to do so with a raincoat wrapped around their $4000.00 camera so it don't get wet!!!!! {because if it does it's dead!!!}
The Panasonic with the Leica lens was the one I had and it took amazing pictures for what it was. If that camera would have been weatherproof I seriously wouldn't need another camera for a good long time.
The technology is changing fast, I get that and it is a good thing at the end of the day. But it sure causes a lot of confusion and "re-education" in between. I remember 15 years ago, my father {a big photography buff} saying to my wife, "these digital things will never take over...you will never get the razor sharpness out of them like you can film...you just will never be able to ge tthem to that point..." I am sure some folks still use them, but now, I don't know where to even find a film camera except maybe in a museum...haven't seen one since my dads.
Matto, I get what you are saying...I just cant get it in my head that these days with today's technology and especially prices, someone that wants/needs to take pictures has to do so with a raincoat wrapped around their $4000.00 camera so it don't get wet!!!!! {because if it does it's dead!!!}