Do these Guns fit the Defintion of a Snub?

a snub has to be a J, K, or D frame with a barrel no longer than 2". There is no such thing as a N frame snub, or a Colt OP snub, or a Python snub. Taurus and Rossi make snubs, but I consider them beneath true snubby contempt, and do not include them:rolleyes:

How about...

Super Redhawk Snubby!
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0038.jpg
    DSC_0038.jpg
    84.2 KB · Views: 39
So what do you guys think is the best oil to run in my Ford F250? Hey just trying lighten things up a bit. What I have learned from this thread is that even if I cut 6 inches off of my 460 XVR's barrel it would not be considered a snubbie. And then there is the question of what I would be considered if I did it. Lots to think about.
 
I'm with those who say:

2" in a J.
2 1/2" or less in a K.
3 1/2" in an N. (And I've questioned myself about this one).

It's about proportion to the frame for me, and I have always seen the above as the "snub" proportions, by frame.
 
Last edited:
Each to his own of course, (here I go off topic) I have always felt that adjustable sights on a 2-3 in barreled revolver are an affectation along with target grips, trigger shoes etc.
 
I'm leaning toward J-Frame 2" or less. Something you can pocket carry. Every size has its place. I have different carry sizes for different conditions, depending on how I have to dress.
Disclaimer: these 2 are newer than 1980 :)
I'm a little prejudice.:o

638-3


649-3
 
Last edited:
What question was that the answer to?

The 60-18 5" J frame .357 was to provide a center fire revolver for shooters with small hands. I suspect a lot of them are used with .38s to start youngsters shooting.
 
I can't believe that we're still talking about this. This is the 21st century people. The attitudes of blatant snubbists can no longer be tolerated! Any gun who feels it is a snub should be accepted as a snub.
Terms like j,k, and n-framed; 2, 2 1/2, 3, 3 1/2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 3/8" barreled; do nothing but cause pain for those "differently framed or barreled".
There is absolutely no reason that a 8 3/8" n-frame should be excluded from wearing an in-waist holster if that is where it feels comfortable. If it sees itself as a 2" j-frame - so be it.
Let's do away with the hate and strive for inclusion of all guns

Now thats funny, I don't care who you are.
 
I can't believe that we're still talking about this. This is the 21st century people. The attitudes of blatant snubbists can no longer be tolerated! Any gun who feels it is a snub should be accepted as a snub.
Terms like j,k, and n-framed; 2, 2 1/2, 3, 3 1/2, 4, 5, 6, and 8 3/8" barreled; do nothing but cause pain for those "differently framed or barreled".
There is absolutely no reason that a 8 3/8" n-frame should be excluded from wearing an in-waist holster if that is where it feels comfortable. If it sees itself as a 2" j-frame - so be it.
Let's do away with the hate and strive for inclusion of all guns



The IJKLN&D Coalition agree......

now you'll have to excuse me......I need to go chose a frame I can "identify" with!!.......today!
 
Last edited:
A Snub is whatever you think it is. The M60-18 is a modern example , but around the turn of 20th cen , long bbl small frame round butt revolvers were common.

Old Bear brought up the question of being "particularily Suitable for concealed carry" , but that is a seperate question. My 2.75in .44Mag , and origional big bore Fitz Specials are definately snubs.

But at my opinions : 2.5 and 2.75 definately are snub. 3.0 inch is split in public opinion , but are good concealed carry guns ( at least in small and medium frame sizes ).

While I aprecate the fine lines of 3.5in M27 , I have always thought of it as its own thing , and not a snub.
 
They're yours. You get to decide what to call them. Heck call them Fred and Ethel if you like. I aint gonna argue with you.:D

For me it's under 3 inches.
 
Back
Top