In watching some of the 2020 SHOT Show videos, I am seeing/hearing the 5.7x28 being touted as a self-defense round. What is your opinion on this round?
Does the 5.7x28 have value as a self-defense round?
- Thread starter lrrifleman
- Start date
Pisgah
Member
The original concept was for a personal defense round that would defeat soft body armor. Of course, that was with armor piercing bullets, something we in the US are generally not allowed to acquire. Will it work against non-armored targets with appropriate bullets? Well,I wouldn't want to be shot with one, and apparently the Secret Service finds it worthwhile.
Fastbolt
Member
Fired out of the PDW with a longer barrel, as originally designed for it?
Or, fired out of the pistol, designed as a companion sidearm for someone carrying the PDW?
I suspect that fired out of a short barreled pistol, using expanding JHP loads, it's probably going to be similarly (or at least) as effective as using a .22MAG fired out of a 6 1/2" revolver barrel.
A friend of mine is a retired military surgeon, and he kept his hand in teaching for both DOD and now a civilian fed agency. After the Ft Hood case he told me he'd been in contact with some of his 'military doctor' friends familiar with the Ft Hood shooting. He said their consensus opinion was that the small caliber pistol round had been so effective because some of the victims were caught in confined areas (i.e. hallway), and were unable to escape, allowing the shooter to inflict multiple hits on them.
Now, in addition to my friend having been a military surgeon, he's also served as a longtime firearms instructor for both private (major commercial school) and LE students, so I asked him his informed opinion on the 5.7 round, fired from a pistol, as a defensive caliber/weapon. He was unequivocal in his preference for a 9, .40 or .45 as a defensive/service caliber, over the 5.7 in a pistol.
Or, fired out of the pistol, designed as a companion sidearm for someone carrying the PDW?
I suspect that fired out of a short barreled pistol, using expanding JHP loads, it's probably going to be similarly (or at least) as effective as using a .22MAG fired out of a 6 1/2" revolver barrel.
A friend of mine is a retired military surgeon, and he kept his hand in teaching for both DOD and now a civilian fed agency. After the Ft Hood case he told me he'd been in contact with some of his 'military doctor' friends familiar with the Ft Hood shooting. He said their consensus opinion was that the small caliber pistol round had been so effective because some of the victims were caught in confined areas (i.e. hallway), and were unable to escape, allowing the shooter to inflict multiple hits on them.
Now, in addition to my friend having been a military surgeon, he's also served as a longtime firearms instructor for both private (major commercial school) and LE students, so I asked him his informed opinion on the 5.7 round, fired from a pistol, as a defensive caliber/weapon. He was unequivocal in his preference for a 9, .40 or .45 as a defensive/service caliber, over the 5.7 in a pistol.
Last edited:
Fastbolt
Member
Probably gun and ammo companies looking to capitalize on the imagination (and wallets) of the general gun buying public.
Same old, same old.
Echo40
Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2017
- Messages
- 4,030
- Reaction score
- 7,821
I think that while it certainly has the characteristics of a viable self-defense cartridge, there isn't much of a reason to choose it over other established self-defense cartridges, not that I'm aware of anyway.
On paper, 5.7x28 should be able to generate remote wound tracks due to the high velocity it's capable of achieving, but I've seen my share of Ballistics Gel Tests conducted on the cartridge, and it did no more damage in Gel than that of the bullet itself.
It's also supposedly good for penetrating light body armor, but only with armor piercing ammo which is illegal for sale to civilians, and there are already other handgun cartridges which can defeat light body armor for whomever considers that to be necessary.
Still, it's an interesting cartridge, and one of these days I might even buy a Ruger-57 once the price settles.
On paper, 5.7x28 should be able to generate remote wound tracks due to the high velocity it's capable of achieving, but I've seen my share of Ballistics Gel Tests conducted on the cartridge, and it did no more damage in Gel than that of the bullet itself.
It's also supposedly good for penetrating light body armor, but only with armor piercing ammo which is illegal for sale to civilians, and there are already other handgun cartridges which can defeat light body armor for whomever considers that to be necessary.
Still, it's an interesting cartridge, and one of these days I might even buy a Ruger-57 once the price settles.
OP
CoronaGold111
Member
Is there more concern for overpenetration (through and through) with a 5.7x28 than with 9mm / 40 / 45?
What's the muzzle blast like?
I know that probably sounds like a stupid comment, given the gravity of the intended use.
But, if you shoot something with a horrific blast and blinding fireball coming out of the muzzle, especially in a dark environment w/o ear protection, your sensory perception of the immediate surroundings is likely kaput.
Sorry if that exposes my ignorance, but it just seems like a factor that is ignored in the ongoing debate of self defense cartridges.
I'm reminded of when S&W introduced the 22 Jet over 50 years ago. Seasoned shooters found it objectionable for anything but controlled range use with good lighting (preferably outdoors), and adequate ear and eye protection.
Jim
I know that probably sounds like a stupid comment, given the gravity of the intended use.
But, if you shoot something with a horrific blast and blinding fireball coming out of the muzzle, especially in a dark environment w/o ear protection, your sensory perception of the immediate surroundings is likely kaput.
Sorry if that exposes my ignorance, but it just seems like a factor that is ignored in the ongoing debate of self defense cartridges.
I'm reminded of when S&W introduced the 22 Jet over 50 years ago. Seasoned shooters found it objectionable for anything but controlled range use with good lighting (preferably outdoors), and adequate ear and eye protection.
Jim
9mm costs about 1/3 as much to buy per round, is more available in more weights/loadings, has many more guns available for choice. Without AP ammo available to US civilians, I don’t believe 5.7 is armor piercing.
In the unlikely event you have to shoot someone wearing armor with civilian 5.7 or any other defensive cartridge, aim above or below the armor.
No advantage whatsoever.
In the unlikely event you have to shoot someone wearing armor with civilian 5.7 or any other defensive cartridge, aim above or below the armor.
No advantage whatsoever.
Last edited:
Any round can be a "self defense" round. If all you have is grandpas top break .22 and you use it during a home invasion its a "self defense round". Thats subjective.
Of course most of us know when we say "self defense" round we mean 380/38SPL and higher caliber.
Does the 5.7 have a value as a self defense round....I say no. Its a cool round meant for a cool gun but the cost of both the guns and the round is prohibitive.
Also its a powerful round and the risk of over penetration with a fast flying small round would be much greater than with a "typical" round.
Of course most of us know when we say "self defense" round we mean 380/38SPL and higher caliber.
Does the 5.7 have a value as a self defense round....I say no. Its a cool round meant for a cool gun but the cost of both the guns and the round is prohibitive.
Also its a powerful round and the risk of over penetration with a fast flying small round would be much greater than with a "typical" round.
HardToHandle
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2016
- Messages
- 559
- Reaction score
- 742
Yes, but...
The 5.7 is a hot round. I tried the FiveSeven and one negative observation was the grenade like detonation of the 5.7mm. Significant muzzle blast/flash as well as some perceived flash from the blowback as the breech block came back. I didn’t feel confident with the system, especially since a FiveSeven setup was going to cost $2500 (ammo+mags+holster+red dot).
I am not saying the FiveSeven is dangerous but it is not for me. The muzzle flash seems likely to make things unpleasant in confined spaces or at night. Revolver guys don’t let this bother them as much, but there is some flash.
On the effectiveness, there were stories on the P90 PDW not being terribly effective in Peruvian Embassy assault and I one or two Texas SWAT shootings. The 5.7 is not something I would want to be facing, just like the criticism of the .30 Carbine. The cartridge was made for carbine/PDW length barrels.
Here’s a video- [ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp1ksKi6r90"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp1ksKi6r90[/ame]
Echo40
Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2017
- Messages
- 4,030
- Reaction score
- 7,821
Wow, I've got to admit that is one heck of a muzzle-flash! I wasn't expecting it to be that big or that bright.
Still, I think the guy you'd be shooting at would have it much worse that you, especially at close-range. You may be seeing spots, and your ears would be ringing, but he'd most likely be blind, def, on fire, and with a structurally superfluous new orifice leaking vital fluid.
Still, I think the guy you'd be shooting at would have it much worse that you, especially at close-range. You may be seeing spots, and your ears would be ringing, but he'd most likely be blind, def, on fire, and with a structurally superfluous new orifice leaking vital fluid.
As an RSO I see a few of these come into our indoor range from time to time. They do have a very loud report as well as a huge muzzle flash. For those two reasons alone I would reject that round as a good personal defense or home protection firearrm. It was designed for a different purpose and oddly enough, LEO agencies in my area are ridding themselves of their PS90's in favor of other better suited calibers.
I had an FN PS90 for a while a few years ago. Muzzle blast and flash weren’t bad in the longer barrel, and you could shoot it until you got tired with the 50 round magazine. It was a fun range toy but I couldn’t figure out any real practical use for it. Obviously, it wasn’t a varmint or big game rifle. Maybe ok for coyotes if fairly close. As a defensive weapon it seemed little better than a .22 Mag and you can’t get the AP ammo that might make it more useful. It was fine for plinking but awfully expensive. I finally let it go and I haven’t missed it.
HardToHandle
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2016
- Messages
- 559
- Reaction score
- 742
Maybe, likely influenced by the platform you are using. The FN FiveSeven recoil impulse is there but it is fast and minimal IIRC. I noted some exaggerated muzzle flip, but even that is manageable and would be tameable with some continued training. The flash and noise are the big signature items. Less than a true flash bang, but somewhere close.
I say maybe because the FN FiveSeven has an unusual Frame mounted safety. My short fingers were not going to reliably activate or de-activate it. As a two handed gun, there are certainly European military applications of the frame safety. it would be a two handed gun for most older folks, as the safety is not very proud either.
FN Five-seveN(R) | FN(R)
The Ruger 57 has a useable rear safety, based on a fondle-only session. I did find the front to back dimension too much, seemed more than the FN FiveSeven. Not in a hurry to shoot one.
The FN trigger is Glock plastic-y and mushy, but not terrible. I would describe it as better than any of the Gen 1 SW MP autos, a bit smoother. Comparable to the best stock Glock triggers, but more creep. That is also based on just a few guns. The trigger would work fine for most older folks I expect (I have some arthritis already and mild nerve damage in my hands).
The other plus is the FN was weight, as in airsoft or toy-feeling light weight. It may weigh the same unloaded as 640 and loaded as a Model 19, but it is stoked with ~20 rounds. The balance is awesome, just a bit biased to the rear when loaded. I cannot recall another revolver or high cap service pistol that feels as weightless. Almost no one should have a problem aiming correctly.
All in all, I would not buy a 5.7 cartridge gun until shooting one. The flash is serious and you should experience it before buying. That said, the limited supply of FiveSevens has kept the used prices pretty high.
The round can deliver hydrostatical damage paths in remote areas of the body, far from the PSC would indicate. Like a rifle round. It can be much more effective over slower subsonic pistol rounds like 9 Luger and .45 APC.
The rounds available to civies, though are called sporting rounds and are not that good for defense. The top tier military and operator loads illegal to own by the public are tremendously more effective.
The rounds available to civies, though are called sporting rounds and are not that good for defense. The top tier military and operator loads illegal to own by the public are tremendously more effective.
Last edited:
Not sure why five-seven
I'm not sure why there is such interest in this round (5.7x28mm) when 22TCM is available. From what I can find the 22TCM is about 300-400fps faster from a pistol length barrel with the same weight bullet. The ammo is less expensive (about 25% or more) and the combo weapons available from RIA can also fire 9mm with a barrel and recoil spring change. Barrels are available for Glock 9mm pistols that can fire the slightly shorter 22TCM 9R ammo. Additionally, since the 22TCM magazines are the same size as 38 Super magazines a barrel for this caliber can be fitted to an RIA pistol and it can also fire 38 Super Comp ammo, but not the actual semi-rim 38 Super cartridge.
I'm not sure why there is such interest in this round (5.7x28mm) when 22TCM is available. From what I can find the 22TCM is about 300-400fps faster from a pistol length barrel with the same weight bullet. The ammo is less expensive (about 25% or more) and the combo weapons available from RIA can also fire 9mm with a barrel and recoil spring change. Barrels are available for Glock 9mm pistols that can fire the slightly shorter 22TCM 9R ammo. Additionally, since the 22TCM magazines are the same size as 38 Super magazines a barrel for this caliber can be fitted to an RIA pistol and it can also fire 38 Super Comp ammo, but not the actual semi-rim 38 Super cartridge.
Similar threads
- Locked
