EOTECH Scope

Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
11,751
Reaction score
18,102
Location
DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
My #4 Son has just received a immediate Agency order to remove the EOTECH scope from the issue Rock River M-16 Rifle.

Anyone have information on problems with these scopes ?

Thanks,
Jimmy
 
Register to hide this ad
No. No. No. No. Now.

I am thinking of mounting an optic for my 686 PC Competitor but for now I am using the excellent installed sights for testing of .38 Wadcutter (148 gr @700+fps) to the maximum psi violent load of Remington 125gr semi-jacketed hollow points at around 1550 fps or so. That is the load that will cut the top strap apart with enough firing to kill the gun in .357 Magnum made anywhere by anybody other than SW.

Flame cutting in the 125gr SJHP original Reno Police Department Issue in the 70's and 80's. We carried 19's, 66's, and Highway Patrolman 28's in those days. We kept our 27's for our own enjoyment because they were too pristine for that sort of tear down in leathered Sam Browne.

Today the N frame in 29 is my personal conceal carry in 4". It is accurate without lots of recoil to bruise.

Perhaps the PDs need to reconsider hiring officers for academy who can handle an N Frame in 29 and use .44 Special for training while issuing 180 grain Semi Jacketed Hollow Points at 1600 fps.

I'd sign up but I'm 58 years old now and I think they'd like younger bones to try that feat. Less shots without spraying and praying.

The EO Tech to my current knowledge is not under fire anymore than other sights mounted.

What I really want is a fixed 4X from Burris in handgun scope to mount above but that I have and it is larger longer than I like above on the rail mount. So far the sights being like SW 41 sights make me think an optic is not necessary. On the rifle M4 an optic is needed for night or lack of light. I'd like to find an illuminated cross hair I've seen by Trijicon...
 
Last edited:
From two strings on another forum:

http://www(dot)lightfighter.net/topic/usg-suing-l3-for-fraud-re-eoturds-ha

http://www(dot)lightfighter.net/topic/reasons-to-switch-agency-from-eotech-to-aimpoint

In both, note that the "(dot)" needs to be replaced with a "." I did this to prevent hot links.

The conduct standards on LF are not like they are here, and some of the language is "spicier". This includes mine, and if you are less tolerant, be prepared to skip over portions or just don't go there. If you want to see a closer approximation of what I am really like, consider my response in the second string listed (which is older). Suffice it to say that in my native area and among my friends, "mom" is a title, and "mother" is a prefix. :eek::D
 
Last edited:
Mmmmm....hot links. Now Im hungry.


[QUOTE=
In both, note that the "(dot)" needs to be replaced with a "." I did this to prevent hot links.

The conduct standards on LF are not like they are here, and some of the language is "spicier".
 
I have a 512 on my AR. Lost zero just sitting in the safe and had to re-zero - very frustrating. I have 2 Bushnell trs-32 on 2 other rifles that were purchased for a 1/3 of the price and never had an issue and was actually thinking about replacing the eotech with one of them.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top