Another "which gun is best" thread devolves into another "My Dad can beat up your Dad" thread.


There truly is no such thing as “the best” for everyone; rather, some very fine choices of compromises that serve most anyone well.
I agree. I owned a CZ-75 Police model that was a rough LE/mil overseas trade in.
Gun looked like hell but ran just fine. But that little slide with the itty bitty serrations was like trying to pull a slippery trout out of its nest when racking.
Down the road it went.
Sig gets my vote. P228 for me
![]()
I knew a former VIP protection guy from the British army. He said they used Sigs because in their testing the Brownings were found to have shot loose before the completion of their training regimen. That was enough of a real world review to convince me that the H Power legend should be treated with caution. It's not the last firearm I've come across where the reality and the legend don't necessarily join up.
I've handled or fired quite a number of 9mm pistols from a wide variety of manufacturers and countries. They all have their features and quirks, but never have I found myself saying, "Oh no, not this, I'd much rather have a Hi Power." I own superior designs (IMHO) myself, but whether any of them will ever be successfully used in combat will be a matter for history long after I'm dead.
Well, since this IS a Smith & Wesson forum, how about the S&W Model 39-2? Fits my hand better than any other 9mm and mine never malfunctioned. Yeah, it is only a single-stack.
There truly is no such thing as “the best” for everyone; rather, some very fine choices of compromises that serve most anyone well.
I doubt that a Glock 17 will ever be a family heirloom.
The Beretta is a clunky brick with a terribly placed decocker/safety.
The Glock is far better, but not finer than the Browning.![]()
If you have to fight with a 9mm, the Glock is a very solid choice.
If’n I knew I was going into a gun fight, I would take a long gun over any handgun no matter the caliber.