Gura's reply brief in McDonald v City of Chicago filed

[ming]

It and that of NRA can be found here:

ChicagoGunCase.com

A quick reading of both Gura's reply and that of the NRA suggests that both have done a nice job in countering the arguments of the defendants. In fact, the arguments of City of Chicago et al seem almost embarrassingly inept.

 

[JWiley]

A good overview/analysis can be found here: Of Arms and the Law: Quick analysis of reply briefs .

As you can see, there are a few points of overlap, but only amounting to a page or so, out of a total of near 70. Chicago gets it from both sides on just about every issue.