- Joined
- Apr 10, 2015
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 1
Hello, I’m a new member. Glad to be here. I have a question about hearing damage that I’ve been unable to find a clear answer to online or even from audiologists (I’ve called two). I’m hoping one of you is knowledgeable enough in this area to help.
Would a .22lr fired without ear protection from a handgun do less damage to the hearing than a centerfire? A .22lr produces fewer decibels, but I’ve read that because it has a higher frequency, or pitch, it can harm the hearing as much as a louder centerfire.
It’s important to me to answer this question because I have substantial hearing loss and tinnitus from unprotected shooting when I was young and ignorant. I want to protect my hearing from any more damage and am thinking about switching from centerfire to.22lr carry in case I have to suddenly defend myself. But I don’t want to make the switch unless the .22lr is truly easier on the ears. If the rumors about damage from the .22lr’s higher frequency is valid, I won’t switch.
Please understand that I’m not interested in resurrecting the debate about the .22lr’s effectiveness as a defense caliber. I’ve researched that subject thoroughly and have my own opinion. I want only to know whether or not an unprotected shot from a .22lr revolver would do less damage, considering the higher frequency. I realize that hearing damage is accumulative. My hearing has already accumulated too much abuse, and a single shot is a big deal to me.
Thanks for your help.
Would a .22lr fired without ear protection from a handgun do less damage to the hearing than a centerfire? A .22lr produces fewer decibels, but I’ve read that because it has a higher frequency, or pitch, it can harm the hearing as much as a louder centerfire.
It’s important to me to answer this question because I have substantial hearing loss and tinnitus from unprotected shooting when I was young and ignorant. I want to protect my hearing from any more damage and am thinking about switching from centerfire to.22lr carry in case I have to suddenly defend myself. But I don’t want to make the switch unless the .22lr is truly easier on the ears. If the rumors about damage from the .22lr’s higher frequency is valid, I won’t switch.
Please understand that I’m not interested in resurrecting the debate about the .22lr’s effectiveness as a defense caliber. I’ve researched that subject thoroughly and have my own opinion. I want only to know whether or not an unprotected shot from a .22lr revolver would do less damage, considering the higher frequency. I realize that hearing damage is accumulative. My hearing has already accumulated too much abuse, and a single shot is a big deal to me.
Thanks for your help.