Echo40
Member
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2017
- Messages
- 4,062
- Reaction score
- 7,900
As someone who is subscribed to many firearms-related YouTube channels I can safely say that the vast majority of videos pertaining to firearms are either main to entertain or to generate buzz in order to bring in more viewers, ergo the vast majority of videos should be taken with a grain of salt and only those presented by professionals with experience, equipment, and understanding of how proper laboratory testing protocol is carried out should be taken as empirical evidence of anything.
Backyard Science with a Cronograph, a couple blocks of ClearBallistics Gel, and a random assortment of rags to simulate heavy clothing in which someone fires a mere 2-5 shots at the target then calls it a day at best represents one possible outcome under similar circumstances.
It's interesting, entertaining, and mildly educational, but shouldn't be treated as proof positive evidence to confirm or deny anything.
Seriously, once you've watched enough videos performing the same basic test spread out between several different channels, conducted under different environmental conditions, using different brands of firearms, different lots of ammunition, and a different random assortment of rags, you'll see that the results are seldom identical.
I guarantee that if more GunTubers attempted this experiment, you'd see a wider spread of different results, and suddenly this would all go out the window with only those suffering from confirmation biased on one side or another cherry-picking tests which went they way they think it will while everyone else yawns and goes about their business.
Backyard Science with a Cronograph, a couple blocks of ClearBallistics Gel, and a random assortment of rags to simulate heavy clothing in which someone fires a mere 2-5 shots at the target then calls it a day at best represents one possible outcome under similar circumstances.
It's interesting, entertaining, and mildly educational, but shouldn't be treated as proof positive evidence to confirm or deny anything.
Seriously, once you've watched enough videos performing the same basic test spread out between several different channels, conducted under different environmental conditions, using different brands of firearms, different lots of ammunition, and a different random assortment of rags, you'll see that the results are seldom identical.
I guarantee that if more GunTubers attempted this experiment, you'd see a wider spread of different results, and suddenly this would all go out the window with only those suffering from confirmation biased on one side or another cherry-picking tests which went they way they think it will while everyone else yawns and goes about their business.