I am going to a county legislature hearing later today and may speak. Our club shooting range is in danger of being closed since an ajoining property owner purchased land and has had an ongoing campaign to close the range since building a house nearby. He built his house behind the original backstop, and we turned our range and rebuilt to the tune of about $20K. This resulted in the range being closed for a year.
The county legislature gave us a permit for 25 years about 4 years ago, but the same man continues to try to close the range. He has gotten petitions from people living in a subdivision that is about 1/2 mile behind the firing line, and has stirred up property owners that are behind the backstop. It is rumored they have contributed to the campaigns of some legislators.
The range has been in operation for nearly 50 years without any incident that I know of. On the 60 acres of club property is a trap range used by high schools for competition and at least one police department uses the rifle and pistol ranges for training.
It is assumed that they don't like the noise, but a state law protects shooting ranges from noise complaints. They want the range closed due the danger of stray bullets causing injury. The new property owner found a quantity (100+?) of bullets on his land and another neighbor says he has a bullet hole in his satellite dish and barn. I think they have caused a "stray bullet hysteria" to justify closing the range closing.
The range has really tightened rules to prevent bullets leaving the range, including rules tests, paper targets only, no offhand rifle shooting. About half of club members are NRA Range Safety Officer trained. The range was inspected by an NRA rep, and suggested improvements made.
Help me present the best argument for why the minimal risk that still exists (all ranges have risk if anyone lives nearby) is allowable, and the range should stay open.
Thanks
The county legislature gave us a permit for 25 years about 4 years ago, but the same man continues to try to close the range. He has gotten petitions from people living in a subdivision that is about 1/2 mile behind the firing line, and has stirred up property owners that are behind the backstop. It is rumored they have contributed to the campaigns of some legislators.
The range has been in operation for nearly 50 years without any incident that I know of. On the 60 acres of club property is a trap range used by high schools for competition and at least one police department uses the rifle and pistol ranges for training.
It is assumed that they don't like the noise, but a state law protects shooting ranges from noise complaints. They want the range closed due the danger of stray bullets causing injury. The new property owner found a quantity (100+?) of bullets on his land and another neighbor says he has a bullet hole in his satellite dish and barn. I think they have caused a "stray bullet hysteria" to justify closing the range closing.
The range has really tightened rules to prevent bullets leaving the range, including rules tests, paper targets only, no offhand rifle shooting. About half of club members are NRA Range Safety Officer trained. The range was inspected by an NRA rep, and suggested improvements made.
Help me present the best argument for why the minimal risk that still exists (all ranges have risk if anyone lives nearby) is allowable, and the range should stay open.
Thanks