How do you guys feel about integrally suppressed bbls on Ruger MKIVs? Pros and cons?
Any other integrally suppressed rimfire handguns?
I have two of them that I really, really like. Lotsa aftermarket goodness to make 'em what we want. Easy to clean, accurate, reliable. Many folks don't like the factory trigger, but I can work with it for the purpose of simple Steel Challenge matches and plinking around. My pet peeve with those is Ruger's insistence on a 4" bbl. If they would just shorten it 1" to 1/2" it would be so much easier for suppressor use. I recall that you can buy those uppers aftermarket, but haven't looked into it in quite awhile.
If I'm to be completely candid though, they usually stay in the safe in lieu of the Taurus TX 22s. They are accurate, good shooting, reliable, and...the extra mag capacity is nice for competition and leagues.
A third option, especially if you're a Sig guy, would be a Sig 322. They're good shooting, reliable, and here's a big bonus: I THINK they have a short enough barrel to keep most of your .22 ammo subsonic, which is a nice thing. I used to have a Ruger SR 22 with a similar sized barrel, and I couldn't hardly get loads to go super out of it. That was the...only thing I liked about the SR 22. It was wildly durable, reliable, and had that short barrel. I myself did not find it to be particularly shootable.
I've not had the pleasure of shooting the S&W M&P 22 Compact, but I hear wonderful things about them.
I'm glad to read that you edited the thread title. I was afraid I had talked in a circle and lost myself along the way in a previous post where I yammered on about centerfire stuff.
On the cans, I myself do love my Oculus, but as previously mentioned would consider a Mustang as well. My close friends shoots a "Q" Erector, and it is a very quiet, lightweight, nice can, and all the modularity you can ask for. Err....As long as you're sticking to .22 LR and not full auto...