Chuck1217
Member
Ayoob addresses this in an article in Combat Hqndguns (Feb '12), says that even when someone is shot behind the lateral line- in other words, in the back- it is still feasible to be determined a 'good shoot.' He says there are case precedents in which a BG was shot a couple times, and the defender kept firing cause the BG didn't go down. Between closing the eyes, blinking etc, the shooter COULD VERY POSSIBLY have not noticed when the BG turned enough- and the shooter couldn't stop his trigger finger in time- to avoid hitting him in the back. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying shoot em in the back- only that there are circumstances where you won't necessarily be convicted of it- I would suggest reading HIS words, not relying on mine- he's the one that testified in the cases. Lol
It is somehow comforting to know that this is possible...but he also says the cost of a defense like that could easily exceed $100,000.
It is somehow comforting to know that this is possible...but he also says the cost of a defense like that could easily exceed $100,000.