I am now officially homeless.

Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
2,099
Reaction score
6,553
Location
Taranaki, New Zealand
For the first time since mid 1986, when my ex wife and I bought our first house, I am no longer listed on any land title as the owner of a residential property. I also do not have a mortgage.

Fortunately Karen has owned the house we live in since before we met so I still sleep with a roof over my head. It was actually an attempt after 25 years together to place both our houses (mine has been rented out since I moved to my current town of residence in September 1997) that lead to this situation.

Unfortunately new lending rules bought in by the government last December to curb 3rd tier lenders also effected mortgage borrowers. The bank would only account for 55% of the rent as income and had to set "minimum" living expenses based on big city costs. According to the bank our $600 per fortnight surplus after expenses, including a higher level of mortgage interest than standard, was on paper a $200 a fortnight deficit (they had to count savings and investments like superannuation contributions as living costs) so they declined to refinance with both properties in both names.

Over the last few years the Kiwi government has done everything they can to discourage private landlords. First they removed the ability to charge depreciation as an annual business expense. Then they removed the ability to recoup annual losses on rental properties (there is always a paper loss) from other taxable income. Finally they have just begun a four year process to eliminate the ability to charge mortgage interest on rental properties as a business expense (any other business can still charge debt interest as an expense). The time was right to sell, become totally debt free, put a lump sum into the superannuation account and take another overseas holiday.

So no mortgage, no credit card debt, no personal or car loans and a lot of additional money into the savings accounts each fortnight to upgrade the car every 3 years and holiday in the US every 12-15 months.

Should have thought of this 5 years ago.
 
Register to hide this ad
So if the purpose is to discourage private landlords, does that mean they are wanting all rental properties to be government-run?
 
So if the purpose is to discourage private landlords, does that mean they are wanting all rental properties to be government-run?

They are wanting people to buy their own homes. Problem is the housing market has been going up fast for the last decade and houses are out of reach for many, so they have decided to attack the "greedy landlords" where it hurts, the wallet, to discourage them.

In the last few months prices have began to come back a bit, but still to high for most of "generation rent" to purchase.

The emergency housing list has gone up by around 20,000 per year over the last 3 years or so, in a country with a population of 5 million). Up not because of government policy. Or so they say.
 
They are wanting people to buy their own homes. Problem is the housing market has been going up fast for the last decade and houses are out of reach for many, so they have decided to attack the "greedy landlords" where it hurts, the wallet, to discourage them.

In the last few months prices have began to come back a bit, but still to high for most of "generation rent" to purchase.

The emergency housing list has gone up by around 20,000 per year over the last 3 years or so, in a country with a population of 5 million). Up not because of government policy. Or so they say.

That won't work out well in the long run. There will be a serious shortage of rental units.
 
They are wanting people to buy their own homes. Problem is the housing market has been going up fast for the last decade and houses are out of reach for many, so they have decided to attack the "greedy landlords" where it hurts, the wallet, to discourage them.

In the last few months prices have began to come back a bit, but still to high for most of "generation rent" to purchase.

The emergency housing list has gone up by around 20,000 per year over the last 3 years or so, in a country with a population of 5 million). Up not because of government policy. Or so they say.

Yup, those "greedy landlords" are convenient villains to point fingers at when economic factors caused by policies create problems. "Big business" is another handy excuse, as are "big pharma", "big business", and "the greedy rich" in general.

Someone owns more than one house, that person must be exploiting those who have no house. Those who follow duly-adopted laws and regulations (taxes, depreciation schedules, business expense deductions) are predatory social beasts, riding on the backs of the poor.

"You have it, I need it, give it to me now" is the same rationalization used by criminals of many types. But when done as a matter of public policy this becomes a noble pursuit in the interests of fairness for all.

Wow! I made it all the way through that without mentioning politics, government, political parties, or candidates! I'm really trying to avoid another ding.

Those who save and invest for their futures must be forced to share the wealth with those who ignore their own families and needs.
 
This is why i always think we my head and not my heart. Decisions such as this should never be made. I hope things turn out right.
 
Back
Top