Unlike Glock .40s that were originally a 9mm design, the semi automatic M&P pistols were actually designed for .40S&W and released in that caliber before the 9mms were released.
.40 S&W is an excellent duty caliber.
The distributor for my local shop I go to has several S&W polly 40s in stock and has had them for quite a while.
Glad to see they are coming out with a metal one now.
I'm done with M&P's for now until they get their QC together (not holding my breath), but that metal 40 is definitely cool and tempting.
I knew a cop who switched from a 9mm (P228, IIRC) to a .45 ACP after the lack of immediate effect when he shot an armed robber holding up a liquor store.Everyone I have ever met in this life who has said that caliber matters, has never been in a gun fight.
Think about that for a minute.
Everyone I have ever met in this life who has said that caliber matters, has never been in a gun fight.
Think about that for a minute.
An ex US marine ( not that that has anytihng to do with it) was hit 15 times with a 45 from his girlfriends ex, and was still able to return fire, and lived to tell about it.
Does that mean we all need to go to a bigger caliber?
https://youtu.be/vViw80If73k
Yea he survived but what was the ammo used . Surely not 230gr of hst or ranger t series !
If folks here are not capable of handling a 40sw they maybe better off with standard pressure 9mm or 380 or a rime fire cartridge . If they don't like a s&w or m&p model move on to what they do like .
MY wife never fired a handgun until our first date when we were 24 or 25 years old and that was a 4x4 club weekend trip in the big cypress and after spending some time with my Colt Huntsman she tried my DW 15-2 revolver in 357mag with some wad cutter loads to start with up to an average 158gr loads and she liked it . My future wife went out and bought her own DW 15-2 6" 357mag a couple weeks later .
She also has lots of trigger time with my 40sw's and 45acp 1911's over the years but she stands 5-2 and is a small built lady but her heads right . It did take a few years after I started to CC before she did but that was more about her size and what she was comfortable with CC'n. Now at 68 my wife no longer wants to shoot her my 40 or 45 and prefers her kimber ultra 9mm or p365xl and she has a 380 for garter belt carry when a dress is needed .
When my grandson was 9 years old he had shooting my wifes m&p 4.25 core 9mm for some time and wanted to shoot the kahr tp40 I was CC'n at the time . It was filled with underwood 155gr 1300fps ammo . So I gave him one round in the mag and side if you can rack it give it a try and keep it held down range he could have more rounds to fire . He did and when he fired it caused him to take a step back but he had a big grin on his face so a full mag was handed to him and he changed his stance to deal with the snappier load and rang a 10" steel plate at 15 yards with every shot with a big ole grin .
I find what a person can shoot well has more to do with over coming any fears they may have starting with a 22lr and work up over time to larger calibers but you still need to know whats going on in there head . A persons physical size can have more to do with the size of there CC handgun and how well they handle a cartridge for CC . My wife hated a freinds CW40 kahr but my full grip kahr 4" TP40 well. Same goes for the standard sig P365 , my wife did not like it but the XL model she wanted. I don't like smaller handguns no matter if in 22lr up to 45 as I carry a full size 40sw or 45 . But there may be the day I want a 9mm for carry and have a 4" compact with dot optic on it but only time and age will tell .
Surely not 230gr of hst or ranger t series !
Many years ago I purchased a Sig 229 in .40 in what they call the DAK version. The gun has enough weight that I have never noticed it to be "snappy" or hard to handle at all. It stays loaded with 165 grain Winchester SXT's. I load Berry 165 grain TC plated bullets for it for practice. With a little bit of practice you can shoot double and triple taps fairly quickly and with very tight groups with the 6 1/2" trigger it has. The .40 fits this platform very well and can be shot well with a little bit of practice.
Jim
Many years ago I purchased a Sig 229 in .40 in what they call the DAK version. The gun has enough weight that I have never noticed it to be "snappy" or hard to handle at all. It stays loaded with 165 grain Winchester SXT's. I load Berry 165 grain TC plated bullets for it for practice. With a little bit of practice you can shoot double and triple taps fairly quickly and with very tight groups with the 6 1/2" trigger it has. The .40 fits this platform very well and can be shot well with a little bit of practice.
Jim
I believe it was the recoil-sensitive 9mm wimps who were responsible for pushing that poppycock.![]()
Yep...and the 10mm-recoil-fearing dainty wrist crowd that the feds hired is why .40 was created. Not complaining...I'm a big fan of .40 (but like 10mm much better)
Agreed, but my problem with 10mm is that the vast majority of 10mm ammo is not loaded to 10mm spec, and instead appears to be loaded to 40 S&W spec. It's the same projectile after all, however you end up paying a premium because it's labeled as 10mm.
Then, with the few lines of ammo that actually are loaded to full 10mm spec, the majority of 10mm guns on the market have questionable reliability with those cartridges.
Agreed, but my problem with 10mm is that the vast majority of 10mm ammo is not loaded to 10mm spec, and instead appears to be loaded to 40 S&W spec. It's the same projectile after all, however you end up paying a premium because it's labeled as 10mm.
Then, with the few lines of ammo that actually are loaded to full 10mm spec, the majority of 10mm guns on the market have questionable reliability with those cartridges.