Watchdog
Member
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2013
- Messages
- 12,511
- Reaction score
- 32,351
Received the August, 2016 issue of the American Rifleman.
For the first time in months, Kimber doesn't have the back cover. It's gone over to Benelli. It seems strange...like not seeing a roll of toilet paper next to the commode or something.
Matter of fact, unless I've somehow missed it, there isn't even one single ad for Kimber in the entire magazine. Colt, Ruger, S&W, and even Les Baer all have full page ads as usual. Even cheap cigars and bargain basement watches have full pages.
I wonder if Kimber had a contract and it expired? Or...what? Sales haven't justified ad prices? Kimber has a beef with American Rifleman or the NRA? Or vice versa?
I can understand cost cutting, but to not even do a half-page or a quarter-page ad in a mega-circulation firearms-dedicated publication seems counter productive to me.
I don't read gun magazines any more, so haven't noticed if Kimber has dropped out of those.
Anyone else notice this? Just curious.
For the first time in months, Kimber doesn't have the back cover. It's gone over to Benelli. It seems strange...like not seeing a roll of toilet paper next to the commode or something.

Matter of fact, unless I've somehow missed it, there isn't even one single ad for Kimber in the entire magazine. Colt, Ruger, S&W, and even Les Baer all have full page ads as usual. Even cheap cigars and bargain basement watches have full pages.
I wonder if Kimber had a contract and it expired? Or...what? Sales haven't justified ad prices? Kimber has a beef with American Rifleman or the NRA? Or vice versa?
I can understand cost cutting, but to not even do a half-page or a quarter-page ad in a mega-circulation firearms-dedicated publication seems counter productive to me.
I don't read gun magazines any more, so haven't noticed if Kimber has dropped out of those.
Anyone else notice this? Just curious.
