In light of the French terrorist attack......

The Republic of France has been our ally since Revolutionary War days, and we must acknowledge our debt to the French people. Unfortunately, throughout the 20th Century we have seen that our French allies have always been there when they needed us.

Decades of social agendas allowing massive immigration into the homeland, dozens of enclaves of foreigners in "no entry" zones for the police or other authorities, roughly 1/6 of the population born outside the country but having full rights of citizenship, and a government that seems intent upon appeasement at any cost.

By the way, anyone with a French passport can pass into the US without a visa.

Life just gets interestinger and interestinger as we go along. Maybe there is something to be learned.
 
What does anything that happened in France have to do with what we do here?


Well, for two things, France is "enamored" with muslims, if "radical" or not, and an air-flight is just over 8 hours at about $900.00 from France to the U S.

And, two more things, the U S already proved in 2001 we do NOT control the air, and; we seem to be just as content as can be with , making damned sure we DO NOT "profile" any body nor anything.

Do you realize there were twelve people killed, and ten or more wounded, because they PUBLISHED CARTOONS ??
 
I started this thread just because I was appalled by the police officers showing up who were unarmed and the fact that people were cowering under their desks while waiting to be murdered.

I remember when the massacre at Beslan, Russia occured and over 350 died while they sat waiting to be executed:
CNN.com - Russia school siege toll tops 350 - Sep 4, 2004

It just happened again just two weeks ago in Pakistan:

Pakistan School Massacre

I am a retired LEO (Chief of a small town department) and a retired soldier (senior Army Infantry NCO). I read this book:

Foreward: Day of Wrath by William R. Forstchen

and I started carrying a long gun in the trunk of my car.

This is coming to us and no one in the entire world is standing up to them.
 
Actually there were armed guard(s) and body guard(s) in the building that was hit, IIRC.

and how much better would have it have been if everybody was armed?

Would it even have happened?
 
I started this thread just because I was appalled by the police officers showing up who were unarmed and the fact that people were cowering under their desks while waiting to be murdered...

...This is coming to us and no one in the entire world is standing up to them.

I completely agree. I don't want to be in the position of that unarmed police officer being gunned down while only being able to put his hands up. Yes, most likely I'll be killed anway but if I'm armed I'll at least have a chance, even if it's a small one.
 
Decades of social agendas allowing massive immigration into the homeland, dozens of enclaves of foreigners in "no entry" zones for the police or other authorities, roughly 1/6 of the population born outside the country but having full rights of citizenship, and a government that seems intent upon appeasement at any cost.

Life just gets interestinger and interestinger as we go along. Maybe there is something to be learned.



Yes. Muslims aren't Western. France is a Western country. See the problem? I do. Western countries must remain Western. Immigration must be stopped.



-------------------------
 
"In light of the French terrorist attack......"

I'm an old man with a CCW permit and a .45 acp. I train (on occasion) with a retired police instructor at the range a couple times a year.

I don't think I could do much against Al Qaeda trained terrorists with full auto AK-47's.

I'd like to think I could, at best, take one with me but I don't think the average civilian would last long in a battle against soldiers in a combat operation.

I do sympathise with your point of good guys with guns can stop bad guys with guns. If nothing else, I draw and stand while my wife, kids or grandkids run the other way.

GF
You'ld do better than you think. They were not trained soldiers but thugs with guns. Like most thugs with guns, they would fold in the face of even well trained civilians. If you train & practice, you are well above the avg citizen, even the avg LEO.
 
Last edited:
and how much better would have it have been if everybody was armed?

Would it even have happened?
There may have been more rounds fired and maybe not. These perps seemed to have had training and a plan. Not everyone who has a firearm on their person could fend off a surprise attack like this. I'm assuredly not against concealed carry by civilians, but not every person who has a license/ permit is a capable pistolero.
 
World seems to be coming to the point where you better be self reliant in everything you do.

Jim, the world has been that way for a number of years now. Now, insane things happen much more often than they did 20 - 25 years ago. Sadly as a nation we have become weak and complacent. It's up to everyone else to take care of "us" whoever us really is. Don't believe me, just look at some of the demands the progressive and protesters are putting out almost daily.
 
Seriously?

Your statement is every bit as offensive as telling people (not otherwise dq'd, of course) they cannot carry a gun. :mad:

We should stop arguing for "concealed" or "open" carry, but , instead, start demanding mandatory carry
 
Actually there were armed guard(s) and body guard(s) in the building that was hit, IIRC.

I've heard this on several reports.......also conflicting reports on if the shooters had military training...... some say yes, some no.

Were the AKs full auto or not.......the one photo of the police car's windshield tells me ; the shooter was very close,short bursts, very good or firing semi......don't know..........they did seem to exhibit some level of discipline.

Also reports that they seemed to have a plan and were looking for named individuals.

I would rather have a gun than not.........
 
You'ld do better than you think. They were not trained soldiers but thugs with guns. Like most thugs with guns, they would fold in the face of even well trained civilians. If you train & practice, you are well above the avg citizen, even the avg LEO.

It appears the killers showed considerable tactical skill, using cover, etc. They also apparently were wearing body armor. Certainly they were better armed than any civilian carrying a concealed weapon would have been.

It sounds as if they had received training. Certainly they seemed to have practiced the requisite skills.

One report suggests they had recently been to Syria.

I'm very skeptical that they would have "folded". They knew whom they had come to kill and why. They were fanatics on a mission, and they carried it out with precision and efficiency.

I find the idea of mandatory carry horrifying. I could throw a rock from where I live and hit any of a dozen people who should NEVER be trusted with a firearm due to physical incapability, poor judgment, or mental instability. I live in a metro area of 1.4 million people. What percentage of a number like that would be unfit to carry a gun? And that doesn't even take into account my sense that people should have freedom to arm themselves IF THEY CHOOSE.
 
Last edited:
I made the original post to spur conversation. Having a mandate to carry a firearm holds equal disagreeable weight to a mandate denying the right to carry at all.

But in the situation in Paris (and many others like Belsen and Pakistan) the mandate was "no firearms allowed" and that didn't seem to work out.
So, instead of making the same mistake over and over again, why not go in an opposite direction, hence, mandated carry.

My personal belief is in constitutional carry being the law of the US and indeed, the whole rest of the world. Since I am 67, i am fairly certain I won't see it in my time, but still.........

Terrorists and criminals are bullies. The only way to stand up to a bully is by overwhelming force.

You know, the "Chicago Way"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPZ6eaL3S2E
 
Back
Top