Is a .50-caliber handgun really useful???

Probably not, except for a very few experts. A light rifle will weigh only a little more, is much easier to shoot well and at longer ranges, isn't as awkward, and you can get into shooting position at least as quickly. Don't forget recoil, a very significant factor when dealing with handguns using huge cartridges. Some people can't handle the recoil well, especially those who don't shoot frequently.
 
Or......it might be better than a spear in this type of scenario;

CIWzKdnl.jpg
 
A .50 caliber handgun is probably a popular subject with the bear thread people; they're always looking for something bigger.
 
50 cal handguns

Well, I've found the S&W to be quite useful. I've taken an old stink bull giraffe and a lion with mine. Giraffe took a 500-gr Hornady through its second vertebrae; lion got a 440-gr hard cast in the neck, and the bullet drilled all the way down to the left hip.
 

Attachments

  • giraffe.jpg
    giraffe.jpg
    79.7 KB · Views: 396
  • IMG_0192.jpg
    IMG_0192.jpg
    59.7 KB · Views: 401
Is a Ferris wheel useful?
Is a car that will go over 80mph useful??
Do you really need a 50" TV and find one useful?
How useful is a more expensive watch?
How useful is most jewelry?
How useful are women high heels or about 1/2 their shoes for that matter?
Do you need a 50 cal hand gun?

Whats with the useful?
 
I'm not sure I could afford the ammo, but I sure would love to shoot one!
 
There's a great story on the forum about a guy taking an American Bison with one.

I bought my 10.5" specifically for elk, but I haven't been drawn for a tag, yet. Yes, it's a bit "big" for elk, but I wanted a challenge. A friend got a nice 5-point bull this year at 67 yards so I know I can get close enough.
 
I’m sure this conversation happened when the 44 magnum first arrived in gun shops all over North America in the early fifties.
I don’t have a 50 nor have a shot one but when I come a cross one at the right price I will likely buy it, and it wouldn’t be that I need a hand gun of that size just simply because I don’t have one.
 
Just because full house loads are over the top doesn't mean that a .50 caliber handgun can not be made an excellent choice. Back when the .50 AE came out there was wild speculation about how useful it would be. A few handloaders got hold of a specimen and soon found out that .50 has everything going for it when it comes to providing optimum accuracy. You get the benefit of a large bearing surface which combined with the right powder charge, bullet, lube, etc. is capable of one hole groups.
I've seen a woman who supposedly worked for the FBI (maybe as a bookkeeper) shoot a .500 Smith that her husband had downloaded for her and in her hands it was scary accurate, she said it was her favorite handgun. I know a couple of guys that although do not shoot a .50 cal. do shoot 45/70 revolvers that have been custom downloaded and they are also very accurate, these guys use them to shoot marmots off rock piles at 100yds.
 
There are firearms that I find useful and some I don't everyone's individual value set and life will impact that. The only reason I would want a .500 is the same reason I would want a Barrett .50 BMG semi-auto rifle. It would upset the handwringing crybabies, snowflakes and moonbats. That does not mean enough to me to overcome the fiscal prudence and the fact that I try not to make a public display of owning/carrying a firearm.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top