Is this a 1917 in the picture?

walnutred

US Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
4,609
Reaction score
3,456
Location
Ohio
It could be the camera angle but the revolver looks too large in his hand to be a Victory. Also with a 38 I'd expect to be able to see projectiles in the chambers from this angle.

The person in the photo is Tom Mangold, KIA 11/30/68.
 

Attachments

  • Tunnel Rat.jpg
    Tunnel Rat.jpg
    59.5 KB · Views: 236
Register to hide this ad
Bless the Mangold Family for their sacrifice.

I agree 1917 … Big Bore
I'm looking at the cylinder bore compared to flashlight & ring.
Another,, maybe observation? Do I see a Large ejection rod knob,, (reflection) ?
Yeah, the ring has a distinct look that someone out there would probably recognize. And he might not be left handed but holding the gun that way to look around tgat rock.
 
N frame, no doubt.
150f7054b53b3d147c4e3795a2283d64.jpg


Sent from my SM-G781U1 using Tapatalk
 
There are pictures of tunnel rats with just about every conceivable handgun from M1911A1s to High Powers to revolvers in .38 Spc. and .45 ACP. There were several experimental handguns tried with silencers including Ruger .22 autos, specially fitted .38 revolvers and the highly specialized Tunnel Weapon, later designated the QSPR, that used a unique piston driven cartridge with tungsten pellets.
 
Somewhat surprised that he wears corporal stripes; very few E-4 corporals at that time (I was a Sp4 a couple years earlier). Looks like 173rd Airborne Inf.; a fine outfit.
 
Somewhat surprised that he wears corporal stripes; very few E-4 corporals at that time (I was a Sp4 a couple years earlier). Looks like 173rd Airborne Inf.; a fine outfit.

My neighbor is 173rd (Vietnam) and he reminds me, that is a fine outfit. Deactivated in 1973 and reactivated in 2000 and is now Garrisoned in Italy.

Corporal Mangold was a Team Leader or Squad Leader in the Infantry.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top